The abandoned site of the Warren Church may be remodeled into supportive housing units.
The St. Francis Center (2323 Curtis St.) is
embarking on a satellite project in the Cheesman Park neighborhood that stands
to benefit a handful of people — none of whom live in the area.
The Warren Church complex sits mostly empty
at 1640 E. 13th Ave. after it was closed in 2014 by its owners — the Mountain
Sky Conference of the United Methodist Church. Regardless, for the last 10
years, the St. Francis Center (SFC) has operated an employment center for the
homeless from one of the church’s auxiliary buildings. The SFC Employment
Services Office also offers a free storage service for clients who need a safe
place for their possessions while they are getting back on their feet.
The proposed project would remodel the
existing structures into a supportive housing facility for those using the SFC
employment service. Essentially, the complex would serve as a temporary
residence for people working toward permanent housing. Rental rates would be
based on the tenant’s individual income.
The controversy surrounding the project is
assuredly not due to the nobility of SFC’s intentions. It can be universally
agreed upon that helping the homeless is a good and necessary cause. Yet,
conflict has arisen due to a set of blaring fiscal incongruencies as well as an
array of social disparities and structural oversights. The inflated costs of
the project presents a ledger of alarmingly lopsided numbers. Further, the
tenant eligibility parameters raise legitimate safety concerns for neighbors
while the remodel would violate numerous Department of Housing (DOH)
regulations and zoning laws.
The St. Francis Center operates an employment service for the homeless from one of the old Warren Church buildings.
The facility is slated to be named the
Warren Apartments but has been dubbed “The Gilded Dormitories” by critics of
the project. Those in opposition — most of whom live, work and/or own property
in the area — have formed a citizen group called Neighbors of North Cheesman
Park. A founding member (requesting anonymity) who works in government finance
has compiled a set of compelling comparisons which illustrate a profound
misappropriation of taxpayer funds.
Do The Math
Recently, a copy of the St. Francis Center
proposal was obtained by a Neighbors of North Cheesman Park member through the
Colorado Open Records Act (CORA). The plans show a 6,090 square foot
residential design consisting of 42 one-tenant units, each 145 square feet in
dimension (10’ x 14’). The estimated construction price tag rings in at a
whopping eight million dollars — $8,101,191.00 to be exact, which boils down to
a cost of $192,886.00 to build each of the 42 (10’ x 14’) units. To give
perspective on this, comparable structures in the area such as the Colorado
School of Mines dormitories were built for $46M to house 400 people at a cost
of $122,500 per unit and the University of Colorado Denver dormitories were
built at a cost of $68M to house 550 people at a cost of $123,636.00. These
data demonstrate that the Warren Apartments will be built with an excess cost 55.7%
compared to local averages. Also, the 145 square-foot units will not include
kitchens or restrooms. Additional comparisons lend further befuddlement to the
exorbitant construction price tag, as it places the building costs at $7.34 per
square foot — a rate 269.2% higher than the Denver per-square-foot average
($1.99) and 420.3% higher than the Colorado average ($1.41). These grossly
uneven comparisons beg the question: why anyone would want to spend so much
money for such a limited facility when the same money could be used to help
many times the amount of projected beneficiaries.
Follow The Money
Gap funding for the Warren Apartments
project will come from the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, from
the Denver Office of Economic Development and the Colorado Division of Housing.
A report issued by the St. Francis Center in January 2018 named the above
entities as partners, investing $9.5 million, $500 thousand and $500 thousand,
respectively. When the final closing on the property commences (it has been
postponed several times), the Mountain Sky Conference of the United Methodist
Church will receive $1.2 million, while BlueLine Development out of Billings,
Montana, will be awarded the $8M remodeling contract and SFC will take over
ownership and operations of the premises. Operating costs will flow to SFC from
taxpayer revenue coffers in the form of vouchers, warranted by the fact that
the facility will offer on-site services for residents.
Communication Issues
The Warren Apartments have been authorized
for construction for some time, yet those living and working in the district
were not informed through federally regulated means. The proposed build
involves exterior remodeling of an existing structure. According to Denver
Development Services, such an undertaking requires that “Building permits must
be posted onsite and be visible from the street.” No such posting exists, and
instead, stakeholders such as neighborhood property owner Chris Mast, are
hearing about the project through the grapevine. In his case, he was informed
via casual conversation with the Executive Director of Warren Village — an
adjacent non-profit facility for low-income single-parent families.
Safety Last
When Mast approached an employee of the SFC
employment office and asked about the Warren Apartments project, he was met
with hostility. He was told, more or less, that if he doesn’t like it he should
move. When he obtained a copy of the Saint Francis Center proposal, Mast
discovered that the facility would adhere to the Housing First guidelines set
forth by the National Alliance to End Homelessness. He found it concerning that
a facility within several blocks of a daycare center and a transitional housing
facility for single-parent families (both at Warren Village) is willing to
house individuals convicted of felony assault, as long as they have not
offended within the last year. The guidelines also state that there is no
policy regulating on-site alcohol and drug use. Plainly put, violent criminals
using toxic substances may be living next to families including recently
displaced women and their children.
Zoning Violations
Thus far, the Warren Apartments issue has
gone largely unopposed because it has been withheld from public knowledge. For
those in city government who are in the know, the project has garnered support
— especially among Denver City Council members who want to cultivate an image
of homeless advocacy. Yet, in addition to the aforementioned issues, the
remodel will violate zoning laws by establishing a “supportive housing”
facility adjacent to an existing structure designed for the same purpose
(Warren Village) and by operating a large residential property that is devoid
of designated parking. To a lesser degree, the proposed remodel will also
violate statutes regulating exterior alteration of historical structures.
There are many potential outcomes should
the project see completion. In a best case scenario, numerous people in need
are given a temporary place to live so that they can get back on their feet. In
a worst-case scenario, this section of Capitol Hill becomes further stressed by
a potential criminal element that endangers neighborhood children. Regardless,
a massive amount of taxpayer funds and charitable money will be spent on an
out-of-state contractor and awarded to religious organizations based in other
districts of Denver. Bottom line, like all other misspendings of tax dollars,
this project makes little sense.
The Neighbors of Cheesman Park have created a website with all of their financial findings which includes a comparative analysis. To access this information, visit www.stfrancis-cheesmanproject.com.
With every New Year comes a clean slate so the question becomes what do we do with this fresh start? Everyone from poet-singer Maya Angelou and Oprah Winfrey to Winston Churchill have offered words of inspiration. Even William Shakespeare motivates us to focus on all the positive opportunities that a New Year will bring.
T. S. Eliot, the Nobel Prize poet and
editor-publisher, said it best: “Last year’s words belong to last year’s
language and next year’s words await another year.”
Here are our choices for shopping, dining
and entertainment to help you approach this New Year with resolve to find the
opportunities hidden in each new day:
3 Don’t
hesitate, Escape to Margaritaville playing at the Buell Theatre through Jan. 5.
The musical comedy features the original songs and the most-loved Jimmy Buffett
classics. Information: 303-893-4100.
3 Untangle
the beauty and mystery of the New Year at Denver Botanic Garden’s Orchid
Showcase Jan. 9-Feb. 16. Information: 720-865-3500.
3 Kickstart
the New Year by kicking up your heels at the annual National Western Stock Show
& Rodeo Jan. 11-26. Information: 303-296-6977.
3 Blast
into the year to the lights, sound, smoke and screaming fans at Hairball
playing at the Paramount Jan. 18. Information: 303-623-0106.
3 Get
the New Year off to a roaring start by building a banking relationship at
Sunflower Bank. Attention and financial guidance have made them the largest
Denver headquartered bank. Information: 303-297-0333.
3 This
is the year for youngsters to get their Rugby On. Glendale’s Youth Rugby
programs invite all players to develop rugby skills while also practicing
teamwork and sportsmanship. Information: 303-639-4713.
3 For
a Black & Bluegrass blast join Temple Emanuel in honoring Rabbi Joe Black’s
10 years Jan. 25, 7:30 p.m. Information: 303-388-4013.
3 Dance
into the year at Neverland as Colorado Ballet presents Peter Pan at the Ellie
Jan. 31-Feb.9. Information: 303-837-8888.
3 Dig
into the New Year by getting a free tree application from Denver Digs Trees
through Feb. 14. The nonprofit offers 10 tree varieties free and/or at reduced
cost for planting on private property and the public right-of-way. The tree
distribution and sale is on April 23. To complete an application or get more
information, including tree varieties, visit TheParkPeople.org. or call
303-722-6262 for a free paper application.
January is the kickstart month of the year
and home to Capricorn and Aquarius zodiac signs. Because it is the first month
of the year it sets the tone for the remaining 11 months. It always seems to us
that there’s a freedom that comes with January. It is positively a month for
passion while also reminding us of the value of nostalgia.
As we enter the roaring ’20s, whether it
will turn out to be the razzle-dazzle year many are predicting will depend a
great deal on what each of us brings to the New Year.
There’s debate about when the old decade
ends. Some say this decade ended Dec. 31, 2019, and the new one started Jan. 1,
2020. Others say the new decade doesn’t start until Jan, 1, 2021; the old one
ends on Dec. 31, 2020. What we know for sure is a New Year’s resolution is
something that goes in one year and out the other.
—
Glen Richardson
The Valley Gadfly can be reached at
newspaper@glendalecherrycreek.com.
It’s that time again when we make
resolutions for all we want to accomplish in the New Year. New Year’s
Resolutions seem like a good idea, but most people only stick to them for the
first few months of the year! In fact, it’s been found that 80% of resolutions
made in January fail by the end of February. But this is not meant to be
discouraging. It just means we need to rethink how we are setting goals. Here
we look at how.
Be Smart!
If we want to improve, our goal setting
needs to improve too! It’s easy to make goals such as, “I will eat healthy.”
However, vague goals can end in frustration as there is no clear definition of
what, how and by when you will successfully achieve your goal. To set yourself
up for success, use these tips for creating “SMART” goals:
S –
Make the goal specific. What do you want to accomplish? Be very clear and avoid
words like “more” or “less.”
M –
Make the goal measurable. How will you determine if you are being successful?
Whether it’s in time, amount, or frequency, make sure you can measure and
evaluate your progress.
A –
Make the goal achievable. Do you have tools to make this goal happen? You want
to be optimistic but also realistic.
R –
Make the goal relevant. Is it important to you? Some people make resolutions
because they’re popular or seem to be the “thing to do.” But to be successful,
you need a goal that’s personal and meaningful to you.
T –
Make the goal time-bound. Do you have a realistic timeline for achieving your
goal? Setting a deadline for what you want to do can make you more accountable
and focused.
Smart Examples
So, how does this look in practice? If, for
example, you want to improve your nutrition, examples of SMART goals are:
• I
will not eat processed sugar six out of seven days per week for the next two
months. I will start this Sunday.
• Starting
today, I will fill half my plate or bowl with fruits and vegetables at lunch
and dinner. I will do this for the next six months.
• I
will eat meat free every Monday starting this week.
• Monday
through Friday I will make my dessert fresh fruit.
• For
the next two months I will not eat directly out of containers or packages.
Ready, Set, Go!
After you’ve created your SMART New Year’s
Resolution, another tip for being successful is to consider having a support
system. Do you have someone in your life who is trying to accomplish the same
thing? Having a support system not only keeps you accountable to your goal, but
also challenges you to create more goals along the way!
If your goal is fitness related, ask a
friend to join you for some workouts, or look into working with a personal
trainer. If your goal is nutrition based, find a nutritionist who can help you
with meal plans and grocery lists. Want to learn something new? Look into
classes in the area. Regardless of what your resolution is, find the resources
that can help you get there. But remember: It starts with you!
In 2020, take ownership and be excited
about what you are working toward! There can be a great deal of stress when you
choose a new goal, but try your best to let that go, enjoy the process, and
reward yourself along the way! Change is hard work and hard work should be
celebrated. It’s going to be a great New Year!
Liz Bravman had a career as a pediatric nurse prior to receiving her Master’s degree in Nutrition Education. After moving to Colorado from the East Coast 15 years ago, she taught at CSU Extension and CU’s school nutrition program, specializing in teaching families how to eat healthy on a budget. She is a nutrition specialist and cycling instructor for the YMCA.
Public Works Scrambles To Find A Substitute; The City Is Also Ending Its Electric Scooter Program
by Glen Richardson
Not Enough Takers: B-Cycle ridership has fallen steadily since its peak in 2014. The system’s riders took 377,000 trips that year compared with 305,000 in 2018, a 19% decline.
Despite a 2020 Denver bike lane budget of
$11 million, another $4 million for bike safety plus $3 million for
“high-comfort” bike lanes on 18th and 19th Streets, Denver B-Cycle is shutting
down on January 30, 2020, and won’t be replaced any time soon.
The company’s exit from Denver will take
737 publicly available bikes off the street at the end of this month.
Moreover, the city is also ending its
electric scooter permit program and hoping to replace it with a system where
scooter and shared bike providers will compete for a city contract.
Bid Peddling
Denver Public Works is now in the process
of looking for a new company to operate bike and scooter services through a
competitive bidding process that isn’t expected to be completed until the
middle of this year. That means months are likely to pass between the end of
B-cycle availability and the debut of a new system.
Amid competition from electric scooter and
bike companies, dwindling ridership and shallow revenues — the city peddled
5,280 annual bike-share passes for free to incentivize biking instead of
driving —many are questioning if the B-cycle era can make a comeback.
City government has helped fund the
bike-share system but did not operate it, and it will not run one in the
future, according to Mike Strott, a spokesman for the Mayor’s Office. In the
first six months of Denver’s sanctioned dockless transport program, six e-bike
and e-scooter companies combined to average about 5,100 trips a day.
Cost Cutting
Costly Cool: By issuing a request for proposals from private bike-share and scooter-share companies to operate in Denver, Public Works hopes the system will be less costly.
By issuing a request for proposals from
private bike-share and scooter-share companies to operate in Denver, Public
Works hopes the system will be less costly. The contracts will replace the
permitting system that has allowed companies like Lime and Jump to operate.
The competitive bidding process “will help
Denver better manage and coordinate the delivery of these commercial operations
and help ensure the city partners with the most qualified operator(s) to
further its mobility goals,” according to a DPW statement. A decision on who
will operate the program(s) won’t be made until at least this summer, Pubic
Works admits.
But even if Public Works is able to get a
new company or companies by this summer, getting a new bike share system up and
running could take several more months. That, many observers including bikers,
worry will make the delay even more lengthy. Upshot: Such a wide gap in service
is likely to push B-cycle users into buying cars. Moreover, many families used
B-cycle so they would only need one car.
Dated System
Scooters Shuttered: The city is also ending its electric scooter permit program and hoping to replace it with a system where scooter and shared bike providers compete for contract.
Denver’s B-cycle bikes and docking stations
needed to be replaced. Many dated to when the system was launched in 2010, according
to Mike Pletsch, executive director of Denver Bike Sharing, the nonprofit that
runs B-cycle. But the organization doesn’t have the money to replace the
equipment or renew its contract with Trek, the bicycle manufacturer that
developed the system.
“The continued aging of the system and the
cost to work with B-cycle is too high for us,” he said. “The funding is just
not there to do it.”
The organization’s 2018 budget totaled $1
million, according to its annual report. The city provided it with $800,000 in
2019, and about half of that was dedicated to a program that handed out the
5,280 free passes.
Falling Ridership
B-cycle ridership has been falling steadily
since its peak in 2014. The system’s riders took 377,000 trips that year
compared with 305,000 in 2018, a 19 percent decline, according to the annual
report. The decrease in riders corresponds roughly with the rise of ride-hail
services like Uber and Lyft, and the arrival of dockless scooters and bikes
last year.
But Denver’s bike share system has never
had the high number of stations needed to reach high ridership levels, like
those in Paris, New York, or Mexico City. According to the National Association
of City Transportation Officials, successful systems provide 28 stations per
square mile. Denver B-Cycle had about a half-dozen per square mile.
“We’ve got 89 stations currently and there certainly needs to be more,” says Pletsch. Those docking stations are spread out over seven neighborhoods and host the system’s 716 bikes.