Church And State Unite With Private Enterprise To Misspend Tax Dollars While ‘Helping The Homeless’

Church And State Unite With Private Enterprise To Misspend Tax Dollars While ‘Helping The Homeless’

by Luke Schmaltz

The abandoned site of the Warren Church may be remodeled into supportive housing units.

The St. Francis Center (2323 Curtis St.) is embarking on a satellite project in the Cheesman Park neighborhood that stands to benefit a handful of people — none of whom live in the area.

The Warren Church complex sits mostly empty at 1640 E. 13th Ave. after it was closed in 2014 by its owners — the Mountain Sky Conference of the United Methodist Church. Regardless, for the last 10 years, the St. Francis Center (SFC) has operated an employment center for the homeless from one of the church’s auxiliary buildings. The SFC Employment Services Office also offers a free storage service for clients who need a safe place for their possessions while they are getting back on their feet.

The proposed project would remodel the existing structures into a supportive housing facility for those using the SFC employment service. Essentially, the complex would serve as a temporary residence for people working toward permanent housing. Rental rates would be based on the tenant’s individual income.

The controversy surrounding the project is assuredly not due to the nobility of SFC’s intentions. It can be universally agreed upon that helping the homeless is a good and necessary cause. Yet, conflict has arisen due to a set of blaring fiscal incongruencies as well as an array of social disparities and structural oversights. The inflated costs of the project presents a ledger of alarmingly lopsided numbers. Further, the tenant eligibility parameters raise legitimate safety concerns for neighbors while the remodel would violate numerous Department of Housing (DOH) regulations and zoning laws.

The St. Francis Center operates an employment service for the homeless from one of the old Warren Church buildings.

The facility is slated to be named the Warren Apartments but has been dubbed “The Gilded Dormitories” by critics of the project. Those in opposition — most of whom live, work and/or own property in the area — have formed a citizen group called Neighbors of North Cheesman Park. A founding member (requesting anonymity) who works in government finance has compiled a set of compelling comparisons which illustrate a profound misappropriation of taxpayer funds.

Do The Math

Recently, a copy of the St. Francis Center proposal was obtained by a Neighbors of North Cheesman Park member through the Colorado Open Records Act (CORA). The plans show a 6,090 square foot residential design consisting of 42 one-tenant units, each 145 square feet in dimension (10’ x 14’). The estimated construction price tag rings in at a whopping eight million dollars — $8,101,191.00 to be exact, which boils down to a cost of $192,886.00 to build each of the 42 (10’ x 14’) units. To give perspective on this, comparable structures in the area such as the Colorado School of Mines dormitories were built for $46M to house 400 people at a cost of $122,500 per unit and the University of Colorado Denver dormitories were built at a cost of $68M to house 550 people at a cost of $123,636.00. These data demonstrate that the Warren Apartments will be built with an excess cost 55.7% compared to local averages. Also, the 145 square-foot units will not include kitchens or restrooms. Additional comparisons lend further befuddlement to the exorbitant construction price tag, as it places the building costs at $7.34 per square foot — a rate 269.2% higher than the Denver per-square-foot average ($1.99) and 420.3% higher than the Colorado average ($1.41). These grossly uneven comparisons beg the question: why anyone would want to spend so much money for such a limited facility when the same money could be used to help many times the amount of projected beneficiaries.

Follow The Money

Gap funding for the Warren Apartments project will come from the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, from the Denver Office of Economic Development and the Colorado Division of Housing. A report issued by the St. Francis Center in January 2018 named the above entities as partners, investing $9.5 million, $500 thousand and $500 thousand, respectively. When the final closing on the property commences (it has been postponed several times), the Mountain Sky Conference of the United Methodist Church will receive $1.2 million, while BlueLine Development out of Billings, Montana, will be awarded the $8M remodeling contract and SFC will take over ownership and operations of the premises. Operating costs will flow to SFC from taxpayer revenue coffers in the form of vouchers, warranted by the fact that the facility will offer on-site services for residents.

Communication Issues

The Warren Apartments have been authorized for construction for some time, yet those living and working in the district were not informed through federally regulated means. The proposed build involves exterior remodeling of an existing structure. According to Denver Development Services, such an undertaking requires that “Building permits must be posted onsite and be visible from the street.” No such posting exists, and instead, stakeholders such as neighborhood property owner Chris Mast, are hearing about the project through the grapevine. In his case, he was informed via casual conversation with the Executive Director of Warren Village — an adjacent non-profit facility for low-income single-parent families.

Safety Last

When Mast approached an employee of the SFC employment office and asked about the Warren Apartments project, he was met with hostility. He was told, more or less, that if he doesn’t like it he should move. When he obtained a copy of the Saint Francis Center proposal, Mast discovered that the facility would adhere to the Housing First guidelines set forth by the National Alliance to End Homelessness. He found it concerning that a facility within several blocks of a daycare center and a transitional housing facility for single-parent families (both at Warren Village) is willing to house individuals convicted of felony assault, as long as they have not offended within the last year. The guidelines also state that there is no policy regulating on-site alcohol and drug use. Plainly put, violent criminals using toxic substances may be living next to families including recently displaced women and their children.

Zoning Violations

Thus far, the Warren Apartments issue has gone largely unopposed because it has been withheld from public knowledge. For those in city government who are in the know, the project has garnered support — especially among Denver City Council members who want to cultivate an image of homeless advocacy. Yet, in addition to the aforementioned issues, the remodel will violate zoning laws by establishing a “supportive housing” facility adjacent to an existing structure designed for the same purpose (Warren Village) and by operating a large residential property that is devoid of designated parking. To a lesser degree, the proposed remodel will also violate statutes regulating exterior alteration of historical structures.

There are many potential outcomes should the project see completion. In a best case scenario, numerous people in need are given a temporary place to live so that they can get back on their feet. In a worst-case scenario, this section of Capitol Hill becomes further stressed by a potential criminal element that endangers neighborhood children. Regardless, a massive amount of taxpayer funds and charitable money will be spent on an out-of-state contractor and awarded to religious organizations based in other districts of Denver. Bottom line, like all other misspendings of tax dollars, this project makes little sense.

The Neighbors of Cheesman Park have created a website with all of their financial findings which includes a comparative analysis.  To access this information, visit www.stfrancis-cheesmanproject.com.

Roaring Razzle-Dazzle Year

Roaring Razzle-Dazzle Year

With every New Year comes a clean slate so the question becomes what do we do with this fresh start? Everyone from poet-singer Maya Angelou and Oprah Winfrey to Winston Churchill have offered words of inspiration. Even William Shakespeare motivates us to focus on all the positive opportunities that a New Year will bring.

T. S. Eliot, the Nobel Prize poet and editor-publisher, said it best: “Last year’s words belong to last year’s language and next year’s words await another year.”

Here are our choices for shopping, dining and entertainment to help you approach this New Year with resolve to find the opportunities hidden in each new day:

3          Don’t hesitate, Escape to Margaritaville playing at the Buell Theatre through Jan. 5. The musical comedy features the original songs and the most-loved Jimmy Buffett classics. Information: 303-893-4100.

3          Untangle the beauty and mystery of the New Year at Denver Botanic Garden’s Orchid Showcase Jan. 9-Feb. 16. Information: 720-865-3500.

3          Kickstart the New Year by kicking up your heels at the annual National Western Stock Show & Rodeo Jan. 11-26. Information: 303-296-6977.

3          Blast into the year to the lights, sound, smoke and screaming fans at Hairball playing at the Paramount Jan. 18. Information: 303-623-0106.

3          Get the New Year off to a roaring start by building a banking relationship at Sunflower Bank. Attention and financial guidance have made them the largest Denver headquartered bank. Information: 303-297-0333.

3          This is the year for youngsters to get their Rugby On. Glendale’s Youth Rugby programs invite all players to develop rugby skills while also practicing teamwork and sportsmanship. Information: 303-639-4713.

3          For a Black & Bluegrass blast join Temple Emanuel in honoring Rabbi Joe Black’s 10 years Jan. 25, 7:30 p.m. Information: 303-388-4013.

3          Dance into the year at Neverland as Colorado Ballet presents Peter Pan at the Ellie Jan. 31-Feb.9. Information: 303-837-8888.

3          Dig into the New Year by getting a free tree application from Denver Digs Trees through Feb. 14. The nonprofit offers 10 tree varieties free and/or at reduced cost for planting on private property and the public right-of-way. The tree distribution and sale is on April 23. To complete an application or get more information, including tree varieties, visit TheParkPeople.org. or call 303-722-6262 for a free paper application.

January is the kickstart month of the year and home to Capricorn and Aquarius zodiac signs. Because it is the first month of the year it sets the tone for the remaining 11 months. It always seems to us that there’s a freedom that comes with January. It is positively a month for passion while also reminding us of the value of nostalgia.

As we enter the roaring ’20s, whether it will turn out to be the razzle-dazzle year many are predicting will depend a great deal on what each of us brings to the New Year.

There’s debate about when the old decade ends. Some say this decade ended Dec. 31, 2019, and the new one started Jan. 1, 2020. Others say the new decade doesn’t start until Jan, 1, 2021; the old one ends on Dec. 31, 2020. What we know for sure is a New Year’s resolution is something that goes in one year and out the other.

 — Glen Richardson

The Valley Gadfly can be reached at newspaper@glendalecherrycreek.com.

How To Make New Year’s Resolutions And Keep Them

How To Make New Year’s Resolutions And Keep Them

by Liz Bravman

It’s that time again when we make resolutions for all we want to accomplish in the New Year. New Year’s Resolutions seem like a good idea, but most people only stick to them for the first few months of the year! In fact, it’s been found that 80% of resolutions made in January fail by the end of February. But this is not meant to be discouraging. It just means we need to rethink how we are setting goals. Here we look at how.

Be Smart!

If we want to improve, our goal setting needs to improve too! It’s easy to make goals such as, “I will eat healthy.” However, vague goals can end in frustration as there is no clear definition of what, how and by when you will successfully achieve your goal. To set yourself up for success, use these tips for creating “SMART” goals:

S          – Make the goal specific. What do you want to accomplish? Be very clear and avoid words like “more” or “less.”

M         – Make the goal measurable. How will you determine if you are being successful? Whether it’s in time, amount, or frequency, make sure you can measure and evaluate your progress.

A         – Make the goal achievable. Do you have tools to make this goal happen? You want to be optimistic but also realistic.

R         – Make the goal relevant. Is it important to you? Some people make resolutions because they’re popular or seem to be the “thing to do.” But to be successful, you need a goal that’s personal and meaningful to you.

T          – Make the goal time-bound. Do you have a realistic timeline for achieving your goal? Setting a deadline for what you want to do can make you more accountable and focused.

Smart Examples

So, how does this look in practice? If, for example, you want to improve your nutrition, examples of SMART goals are:

•           I will not eat processed sugar six out of seven days per week for the next two months. I will start this Sunday.

•           Starting today, I will fill half my plate or bowl with fruits and vegetables at lunch and dinner. I will do this for the next six months.

•           I will eat meat free every Monday starting this week.

•           Monday through Friday I will make my dessert fresh fruit.

•           For the next two months I will not eat directly out of containers or packages.

Ready, Set, Go!

After you’ve created your SMART New Year’s Resolution, another tip for being successful is to consider having a support system. Do you have someone in your life who is trying to accomplish the same thing? Having a support system not only keeps you accountable to your goal, but also challenges you to create more goals along the way!

If your goal is fitness related, ask a friend to join you for some workouts, or look into working with a personal trainer. If your goal is nutrition based, find a nutritionist who can help you with meal plans and grocery lists. Want to learn something new? Look into classes in the area. Regardless of what your resolution is, find the resources that can help you get there. But remember: It starts with you!

In 2020, take ownership and be excited about what you are working toward! There can be a great deal of stress when you choose a new goal, but try your best to let that go, enjoy the process, and reward yourself along the way! Change is hard work and hard work should be celebrated. It’s going to be a great New Year!

Liz Bravman had a career as a pediatric nurse prior to receiving her Master’s degree in Nutrition Education. After moving to Colorado from the East Coast 15 years ago, she taught at CSU Extension and CU’s school nutrition program, specializing in teaching families how to eat healthy on a budget. She is a nutrition specialist and cycling instructor for the YMCA.

Cycle Lane Lunacy? B-Cycle Is Shutting Down

Cycle Lane Lunacy? B-Cycle Is Shutting Down

Public Works Scrambles To Find A Substitute; The City Is Also Ending Its Electric Scooter Program

by Glen Richardson

Not Enough Takers: B-Cycle ridership has fallen steadily since its peak in 2014. The system’s riders took 377,000 trips that year compared with 305,000 in 2018, a 19% decline.

Despite a 2020 Denver bike lane budget of $11 million, another $4 million for bike safety plus $3 million for “high-comfort” bike lanes on 18th and 19th Streets, Denver B-Cycle is shutting down on January 30, 2020, and won’t be replaced any time soon.

The company’s exit from Denver will take 737 publicly available bikes off the street at the end of this month.

Moreover, the city is also ending its electric scooter permit program and hoping to replace it with a system where scooter and shared bike providers will compete for a city contract.

Bid Peddling

Denver Public Works is now in the process of looking for a new company to operate bike and scooter services through a competitive bidding process that isn’t expected to be completed until the middle of this year. That means months are likely to pass between the end of B-cycle availability and the debut of a new system.

Amid competition from electric scooter and bike companies, dwindling ridership and shallow revenues — the city peddled 5,280 annual bike-share passes for free to incentivize biking instead of driving —many are questioning if the B-cycle era can make a comeback.

City government has helped fund the bike-share system but did not operate it, and it will not run one in the future, according to Mike Strott, a spokesman for the Mayor’s Office. In the first six months of Denver’s sanctioned dockless transport program, six e-bike and e-scooter companies combined to average about 5,100 trips a day.

Cost Cutting

Costly Cool: By issuing a request for proposals from private bike-share and scooter-share companies to operate in Denver, Public Works hopes the system will be less costly.

By issuing a request for proposals from private bike-share and scooter-share companies to operate in Denver, Public Works hopes the system will be less costly. The contracts will replace the permitting system that has allowed companies like Lime and Jump to operate.

The competitive bidding process “will help Denver better manage and coordinate the delivery of these commercial operations and help ensure the city partners with the most qualified operator(s) to further its mobility goals,” according to a DPW statement. A decision on who will operate the program(s) won’t be made until at least this summer, Pubic Works admits.

But even if Public Works is able to get a new company or companies by this summer, getting a new bike share system up and running could take several more months. That, many observers including bikers, worry will make the delay even more lengthy. Upshot: Such a wide gap in service is likely to push B-cycle users into buying cars. Moreover, many families used B-cycle so they would only need one car.

Dated System

Scooters Shuttered: The city is also ending its electric scooter permit program and hoping to replace it with a system where scooter and shared bike providers compete for contract.

Denver’s B-cycle bikes and docking stations needed to be replaced. Many dated to when the system was launched in 2010, according to Mike Pletsch, executive director of Denver Bike Sharing, the nonprofit that runs B-cycle. But the organization doesn’t have the money to replace the equipment or renew its contract with Trek, the bicycle manufacturer that developed the system.

“The continued aging of the system and the cost to work with B-cycle is too high for us,” he said. “The funding is just not there to do it.”

The organization’s 2018 budget totaled $1 million, according to its annual report. The city provided it with $800,000 in 2019, and about half of that was dedicated to a program that handed out the 5,280 free passes.

Falling Ridership

B-cycle ridership has been falling steadily since its peak in 2014. The system’s riders took 377,000 trips that year compared with 305,000 in 2018, a 19 percent decline, according to the annual report. The decrease in riders corresponds roughly with the rise of ride-hail services like Uber and Lyft, and the arrival of dockless scooters and bikes last year.

But Denver’s bike share system has never had the high number of stations needed to reach high ridership levels, like those in Paris, New York, or Mexico City. According to the National Association of City Transportation Officials, successful systems provide 28 stations per square mile. Denver B-Cycle had about a half-dozen per square mile.

“We’ve got 89 stations currently and there certainly needs to be more,” says Pletsch. Those docking stations are spread out over seven neighborhoods and host the system’s 716 bikes.