Despite $1.46 Billion Budget, City Among 50 Worst; Auditor
Cites Pay-To-Play Politics At Public Works, Parks
Community Circle: Community road upkeep and care was once a major focus of Public Works. Now, however, bike lane buildup has become department’s top priority.
by Glen Richardson
Albeit city salaries are about $1 billion annually, Denver
can no longer crack a spot in America’s 100 best-run cities, falling into the
50 worst-run big cities in the nation, ranked 117.
A study released last month by WalletHub compared America’s
150 biggest cities to determine the best and worst run municipalities, based
upon their operating efficiency. The online financial website constructed a
“Quality of City Services” score — comprising 37 key performance indicators
grouped into six service categories — that was then measured against the city’s
total per-capita budget. The website that recently ranked Denver the 13th best
city to live in is owned by Washington D.C.-based Evolution Financial Inc.
Among comparable big cities, Las Vegas (46th), Portland
(65th), Boston (67th) and Houston (73rd) were ranked in the top 75 best run
cities, providing residents with much more bang for their buck. Moreover,
Aurora (54th) and Colorado Springs (58th) were significantly better at
planning, coordinating and managing than was the City of Denver.
Public Works Problems: Beset by city’s massive buildup and seeming inexperienced leadership created city’s Convention Center crisis. Meanwhile political projects sink department’s community service.
Spending Spree
Numbers have hinted at Denver’s dismal performance since
Mayor Michael Hancock first took office in 2011. Rather than a city manager,
Denver has a strong mayor, weak city council system. The mayor can approve-veto
any council ordinance or resolution and is responsible for the city budget and
appointments to city departments. The city now spends nearly $1 billion
annually on salaries alone, up from $600 million just eight years ago. The
city’s budget has grown each year since 2010. Denver’s $1.46 billion 2019
budget is up 3% from 2018.
The number of municipal employees has grown by more than
20%. General Administration — which includes the mayor’s office and the city
attorney — has grown by 48%. Hancock’s 2019 budget calls for hiring another 260
full-time employees spread across 11 cabinet-level departments. Staffing in
departments like Community Planning & Development has grown by more than
80% during Hancock’s first two terms.
Even more worrisome, during the May municipal election, the
mayor proposed the creation of several new offices, including a Department of
Transportation & Infrastructure. That division would replace and
significantly expand the out of control Public Works Department.
Political Patronage
Neighborhood dissatisfaction with Denver’s quality of
service — a key component in rating America’s best and worst cities — is
reflected by the political patronage in appointments made by the Hancock
Administration. Too often they have trouble using taxpayers’ funds wisely (if
not improperly) or abusing their positions, critics claim.
Beauty Becoming Beast: Denver’s parks and parkways have been one of city’s biggest assets. Plagued by political pressure, pathetic managing department projects are late, property being sold off.
Hancock named Eulois Clarkley Executive Director of Denver
Public Works in November 2017. He oversees 1,300 employees responsible for city
road maintenance, trash collection, design-constructions of streets, public
buildings plus parking management.
Clarkley’s selection as Public Works Director was made
chiefly to create and expand Denver bike lanes. His exceptional job of adding
multiple bike lanes has incensed dozens of neighborhoods. The former Deputy
Director of the Houston-Galveston Area Council, seemingly lacks experience
managing the $340 million department budget let alone overseeing contracts for
the city’s massive construction projects that created the Convention Center
scandal.
Park-Rec Problems
Appointment of Allegra “Happy” Haynes as Executive Director
of Denver Parks & Recreation nearly four years ago is another example.
Besides the Parks & Rec job she remains the At-Large Board Member of Denver
Public Schools.
Park Hill Pillage: One of eight city golf courses managed by Denver Parks & Recreation, the 155-acre Park Hill Golf Course is being sold to a developer.
The department which includes the Golf Enterprise Fund, has
a budget of more than $150 million. A staff of 550 full-time plus 1,500
part-time employees manage 240 parks and parkways, plus 14,000 acres of
mountain parks, 309 athletic fields and eight golf courses.
She has overseen the destruction of several city open
spaces, including agreeing to the redevelopment of Park Hill Golf Course that’s
outraged neighborhoods along with former Mayor Wellington Webb. Of 14
recommendations in the May 2017 Golf Enterprise Fund audit by Auditor Timothy
O’Brien, CPA, Denver Golf fully implemented five, partially implemented three,
and did not implement six at all.
Golf Double Bogie
Haynes and Denver Golf haven’t yet created a strategic plan
and city officials think it will take through the end of 2020 to finish it. If
this occurs, it will be two years from the time the agency stated
implementation.
Denver Golf claims the delay is due to projects such as the
music festival at the Overland Golf Course, and because the agency was waiting
for Parks & Recreation to finalize a 10-year strategic plan. Financial
procedure documentation, rotation of duties and performing accurate counts of
assets have yet to be implemented.
“This should’ve been an eagle for Denver Golf,” Auditor
O’Brien suggests. “It looks more like a double bogie.”
Bidding Scandal
Management has become so bad at City Hall that following the
Public Works bidding scandal, the Denver Auditor’s Office began looking at the
city’s Public Works, Parks & Recreation and Public Health & Environment
departments. Audits discovered that the city allowed some contracts to be
longer than recommended with inadequate justification and didn’t verify that
some companies were in good standing to do business.
Dismal Denver Days: Soaring spending and sliding quality of service has dropped Denver into the 50 worst-run cities in America. Big cities like Las Vegas (46th) and Boston (67th) provide residents with a bigger bang for the buck than Denver ranked 117.
The auditor found that none of the three departments had
policies for handling conflicts of interest for each project put out to bid.
“You don’t want city employees that are part of the procurement process to be
influenced by tickets to a ballgame or a meal or something like that,” Auditor
Tim O’Brien explains. Right now in Denver, only vendors that are awarded
non-competitive work must disclose contributions.
Auditors also found that when disclosures of political
contributions were required, few contractors submitted the form to the Clerk
& Recorder. The auditor sampled 41 city contractors from the three agencies
and found that only five had provided the disclosures. Parks and Rec officials
say they had discussions about conflicts, but the conversations were never
documented.
Audits Ignored
Worse yet, two city agencies haven’t fully implemented
recommendations made in three separate reports from Denver Auditor O’Brien. In
addition to the Golf Enterprise Audit, personally identifiable information in
the city’s July 2017 Salesforce audit and the November 2017 Software Asset
Management assessment weren’t followed through.
Keeping City Upright: Denver’s elected City Auditor Timothy M. O’Brien, CPA, right, helps keep city from getting worse. Many of his recommendations, however, are not fully implemented or not at all.
“I’m disappointed to see so many of our recommendations not
fully implemented or not implemented at all — especially after agencies agreed
to them,” Auditor O’Brien worries. “The city needs to take our recommendations
seriously because they help improve stewardship of taxpayer dollars.”
Meanwhile, in the Salesforce Personally Identifiable
Information audit, Technology Services fully implemented five out of six
recommendations. Technology Services fully implemented two of the four
recommendations in the Software Asset Management assessment, conducted for the
auditor’s office by Deloitte & Touche.
Residents, Cyclists Warn Plan Would Harm Picturesque
Stretch, Best Bike Ride In Denver
by Glen Richardson
Listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1986,
South Marion Street Parkway is designed with a wide expanse of turf, flowering
shrubs, and a natural coniferous forest of pine, spruce and fir. Many longtime
local cyclists claim it is, “the best bike ride in Denver.” Residents have
chosen to live here because of the serene beauty it affords as Denver continues
to grow and expand.
Historic Parkway: Listed on the National Register of Historic Places, South Marion Street Parkway is a wide expanse of turf, flowering shrubs, and a naturalist forest of pine, spruce and fire.
Stretching four blocks, this linear parkway passes through a
residential neighborhood before it terminates at the north edge of Wash Park.
Appearing in a component of George Kessler’s 1907 plan for the Denver Park
& Parkway System, the land was acquired in 1909 and the parkway was largely
completed four years later. Landscape architect S.R. DeBoer bordered the
parkway with an allee of deciduous trees: Elms line the parkway at its
northernmost end as it connects with Speer Blvd., red oak and honey locust
parallel the central segment, and sycamore trees were planted to create a
dramatic formal entrance to Wash Park.
More than 105 years later, the bicycle bullies at Denver
Public Works want to deface the historic parkway with curbs and plastic posts
to physically buffer bike riders from cars. Led by bike activist Samuel Piper,
the department is eager to spend the $18 million bundle it is getting. The
money is the department’s share of cash from a 2017 voter approved billion buck
loan to build stuff around the city.
Scenic Ride: Bike path already exists along the historic parkway and proposed changes would be a marginal enhancement for a few to the detriment of the many local residents.
Bike Lane Blasphemy
“Protecting these parkways with their tree-lined sidewalks
creates the green oasis, visual beauty and character that defines Denver,” say
about 180 neighborhood residents who signed a petition against the plan. They
recently dropped the petition off at the Mayor’s office.
Maintaining the city should “leave the bike lane as is,”
these residents believe the plan is “four blocks of unnecessary aggravation.”
Noting that the bike path already exists, they suggest the proposed changes
would be a marginal enhancement for a few to the detriment of the many local
residents. Moreover, they submit it is dishonest and illegal. “The city’s
proposal is a solution in search of a problem, they argue. “There are less
intrusive ways to accomplish these goals,” they conclude.
Patsy Brown who attended a city hosted public meeting on the
plan says, “I asked if they were aware the parkway is part of the Denver
Landmark of Historic Places. They seemed unaware nor did they care,” she says
in frustration and anger. Brown lives in one of several high-rises along S.
Marion Parkway. In viewing the rather strict guidelines for single family homes
that front to a designated parkway, it seems only logical that the parkways themselves
should adhere to the same level of protection.
Biker Opposition
Despite backing for the city plan by former BikeDenver
members — BikeDenver and Bicycle Colorado recently merged — many avid area
cyclists oppose high-comfort lanes along the parkway. They say bike traffic is
so light here changes simply aren’t needed. “Instead someone needs to monitor
how fast the bicycles along here are traveling,” they submit.
Biking Utopia: Local bikers says the four-block stretch of bike lanes here were designed to be enjoyed for its tranquil, peaceful splendor and shouldn’t be defaced by Denver.
Their point: “This is a special four-block stretch of bike
lanes designed to be enjoyed for its tranquil, peaceful splendor. The lanes
here were never designed to be used as a racetrack for bikers going to Wash
Park.”
Citizens living in and around Marion Parkway are, of course,
pleased local bikers within the area appreciate the parkway. Resident Patsy
Brown say, “My concern, and that of most of the residents along the parkway, is
that the proposed High Comfort bike lanes do not take into account the
protected status of our parkway and would in fact, desecrate it.”
Residents Ignored
“There has been no transparency and our input has not been
welcomed,” adds Ruth Ann Zisser displaying her annoyance and irritation. She
lives in the parkway’s Marionpark Condominiums.
Beautiful Blocks: Stretching four blocks, this linear parkway passes through a residential neighborhood before it terminates at the north edge of Wash Park.
“Many of us believe the government of Denver and its
departments involved with this project have been very careful to make sure none
of us knew about their plans until the last minute,” Zisser tells the
Chronicle.
“That,” she continues, “is after the city had input and
planning from the bicycle transportation groups but not from the citizens who
live in this neighborhood.”
School Concerns
Steele Street Elementary takes up a full block along the
east side of the parkway and area parents worry that adding protected bike
lanes will only add to the congestion and increase danger to both school
children, parents and bikers.
Despite assurances to the contrary by the city, residents
also express alarm that fire trucks answering calls to one of four condos on
the east side of the parkway will not have enough room to navigate their
trucks.
They point out that fire trucks are called to the parkway at
least once a week “Any lessening of space would greatly impede their ability to
answer calls in a timely fashion,” they fear.
A Higher Standard
“We just want to get the word out to our neighbors in Wash Park
and elsewhere because there has been virtually no notice given, and our fear is
that it will be another fait accompli as the city decides to move ahead with
the design,” those living on Marion Parkway say.
High Standard: Denver’s own guidelines say the street should be held to even higher standards. Both a street and parkland it is the ribbon that ties parks and neighborhoods together.
Protected bike lanes are not new to Denver, but they are
sparse compared to the traditional lanes painted on the periphery of roads.
They exist mostly on downtown streets and along South Broadway, but never along
a protected parkway registered on the National Register of Historic Places.
The significance of keeping these four blocks from being
defaced by Denver Public Works is clarified faultlessly by the city’s own
Designated Parkways & Boulevards Guidelines: “Denver’s designated parkways
and boulevards elevate The Street to an even higher standard of urban design.
They are both street and parkland and are the ribbon that ties our historic
parks and neighborhoods together.”
One of Denver’s most experienced and successful attorneys,
Craig Silverman, is joining one of Denver’s top law firms of Springer and
Steinberg, P.C. He is also well known as a radio show host on Saturday mornings
at 710 KNUS radio host and noted for his independent viewpoint. He launched his
legal career at the Denver District Attorney’s Office, prosecuting some of
Colorado’s and the nation’s highest profile criminal cases.
Prominent Denver Attorney Joins Law Firm: One of Denver’s most well-known attorneys, Craig Silverman, joins the prestigious Springer & Steinberg Law Firm.
In 1997, he partnered with David Olivas at Silverman and
Olivas, P.C., a well-known boutique law firm in the heart of Denver’s LODO
area. There, Silverman successfully represented hundreds of civil and criminal
defense clients. And now, Silverman is launching a new chapter in his legal
career at the law offices of Springer and Steinberg, P.C.
Silverman says, “I was most interested, flattered, and
excited about being recruited by Springer and Steinberg, P.C. Jeff Springer and
Harvey Steinberg have been good friends of mine for many decades. I’ve played
lots of sports with Jeff and plenty of poker with Harvey.”
Steinberg says, “I’ve known Craig for over 50 years. I
followed his career as a prosecutor and marveled at his success. I watched
Craig move into the world of civil practice and, as expected, his success there
rivaled his prior accomplishments as a prosecutor. Given the closeness of our
families, I am happy we will finally be able to join forces at the best and
most effective law firm ever.”
Springer echoes those sentiments. “Craig and I go way back,”
he says. “We’ve always respected Craig and his abilities as a trial lawyer and
fierce competitor. Craig is fun to be around and fits in perfectly at Springer
and Steinberg where we have a team approach to winning cases for our clients.
The law firm has close ties with the City of Glendale.
Springer has served as Glendale City Attorney for over a decade and has been
involved in Glendale’s remarkable development. Silverman points out he’s played
a role in Glendale as well, and in 2013 was hired to help screen applicants to
be the new Glendale Police Chief, a process which led to the hiring of Chief
Joe Hoskins.
You could say Silverman’s love affair with “courts” began in
the gym at Denver’s George Washington High School where he was a standout
basketball player, earning seven varsity letters in basketball, golf and
baseball. He continued his athletic career in college, setting a single season
scoring record at Colorado College, over 20 points a game.
Silverman’s Passion For “Courts” Started In High School: 1974 photo of Craig Silverman in action at George Washington High School where he was a unanimous All-City selection in basketball and golf.
In June 1980, following his second year at CU Law School, he
began work as an intern at the Denver District Attorney’s Office. He went on to
become a Chief Deputy DA. “I prosecuted many violent Denver criminals,”
Silverman recounts, “Including Quintin Wortham, the Capitol Hill Rapist, and
Frank Rodriguez, Denver’s only modern-day death penalty verdict.”
Following the 1993 “summer of violence” in Denver, Silverman
was the prosecutor in one of Denver’s highest profile murder cases. Shane Davis
and Stephen Harrington were convicted of brutally murdering Tom Hollar and
sentenced to life in prison plus 200 years. The two-week trial was televised
live on Court TV. Silverman explains, “Tom’s widow, Christina Hollar,
captivated good people everywhere as she bravely testified regarding the horror
of her husband Tom being shot dead at 11th and Corona as he tried, in vain, to
protect her from being carjacked.”
Silverman’s legal experience and engaging style were
appreciated by local and national media outlets. He regularly appeared on local
TV stations to provide expert analysis during the OJ Simpson murder case.
Another Denver attorney, Dan Caplis, was doing a daily afternoon radio show on
AM 760 covering the Simpson “Trial of the Century” and Silverman says, “He had
me on regularly which began our friendship that lasts to this day.” In fact,
the two started the Caplis and Silverman Show on KHOW Radio in 2004, a popular
afternoon drive radio show that lasted over eight years.
Silverman’s legal and media careers converged in 1996, after
he ran as an Independent candidate to unseat incumbent DA Bill Ritter.
Silverman says, “I lost my race for Denver DA in November 1996, and in December
1996 JonBenét Ramsey was murdered in her Boulder home. Media outlets called me,
and I again responded.” Silverman appeared on many network and national cable
TV shows and that continued through other Colorado cases including Columbine,
the Oklahoma City bombing trial, the Kobe Bryant case and the Aurora theater
massacre.
In 2014 he began the Craig Silverman Show which continues to
air every Saturday morning from 9 a.m. ’til noon on 710 KNUS radio. The
schedule suits Silverman perfectly. He says, “I relish the opportunity to recap
the week and express my thoughts about what happened, without having to worry
about any interference with my primary job. My work as a lawyer for my clients
is always my priority.”
Radio Host: Craig Silverman hosts a popular radio show on 710 KNUS Saturday mornings from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. He is noted for his independent viewpoint.
In fact, Silverman explains, “Preparation is critical to
putting on a great radio show and the same is true for putting together a
client’s best case. Teamwork and a fierce desire to fight for justice make it
happen at Springer and Steinberg.”
The firm is mid-sized with 30 some legal professionals
dedicated to helping clients. Steinberg is famous as a pre-eminent criminal
defense lawyer while Springer is an experienced and widely respected attorney
who leads a large legal team working on serious injury and wrongful death
cases.
Silverman says he will be focusing primarily on helping
victims of bad driving and other injury-causing misconduct. “Helping people who
have been victimized by the transgressions of others is what I most enjoy as an
attorney and is a natural extension of my work as a prosecutor.” Silverman
notes as a member of the Springer and Steinberg team, he won’t have to worry
about administrative responsibilities like he did at his own firm. “That means
more time with clients, preparing their cases and fighting for justice for our
clients.”
For more information or to contact Craig Silverman at Springer and Steinberg, call 303-861-2800 or csilverman@springersteinberg.com.
Mayoral Runoff: 9News hosted a debate on May 21 in their studio. Michael Hancock is relying on large donations from developers, lobbying firms, and law firms to fund his negative attacks against his opponent Jamie Giellis. Giellis is hoping her grassroots approach of one-on-one contact and neighborhood visits will propel her to victory on June 4.
In the May 7 Denver Municipal Election two-time incumbent
Mayor Michael Hancock received only 38.65% of the vote and his prior pledge to
not campaign negatively went very much out the window. Led by the Brownstein
Farber Law Firm, the lobbying firm CRL Associates, Colorado Concern and myriad
“high-density developers,” money has poured into the Hancock campaign to muddy
up political neophyte Jamie Giellis who finished second with 24.86% of the
vote.
Hancock had hoped, and expected, to receive over 50% of the
vote and had only run positive ads about himself and his affability, which
apparently was not effective as over 60% of Denver voters voted for someone
other than Hancock. After election night, two other main challengers Lisa
Calderón and Penfield Tate endorsed Giellis. Hancock, in response, garnered the
support of former mayors Wellington Webb and John Hickenlooper.
Challenger: Jamie Giellis is hoping her grassroots efforts and her bus tour that spanned all 78 Denver neighborhoods will be enough to defeat incumbent Mayor Michael Hancock. An incumbent Mayor of Denver has not lost a race in 36 years.
Giellis, who had never run for political office before, appeared
shocked at first by the Hancock onslaught and appeared ill-prepared for the
inevitable claim by the Hancock forces that she was a “racist.” Giellis had
appeared on the Brother Jeff Fard’s radio show and did not correctly identify
what each of the letters in the acronym NAACP stood for. The failure to
correctly identify each of the letters made national news.
Not being a seasoned politician, Giellis did not scrub all
of her social media when she entered the mayor’s race, and what she asserts are
seemingly innocent observations were recast as being “racist.” Her notation
that in some cities there were seemingly few Chinese in today’s Chinatowns was
claimed to be anti-Asian. A tweet for a “meet & greet fundraiser at La
Cocinita for a nacho/taco bar, lowriders, and a conversation about Denver on
May 16” was declared by the Hancock campaign to be anti-Hispanic even though
the event was titled such by the owner of La Cocinita restaurant, a Hispanic,
and not Giellis.
On Saturday, before the ballots went out on May 20, Hancock
began television ads which stated, “like Trump, (Giellis) called undocumented
immigrants criminals.” A Denver Post fact checker reputed the claim but the ad
has appeared to be effective even if apparently dishonest.
Incumbent: Michael Hancock has launched a negative campaign against his runoff opponent Jamie Giellis. After Hancock was unable to receive the necessary votes to win on May 7 and avoid the runoff, Hancock launched a negative campaign to help save his campaign.
Giellis did, however, appear to rebound. Lacking money for
television ads she had a press conference where she accused Hancock of
fostering a “poisonous culture” of sexual harassment with graphs showing Denver
taxpayers paying nearly $1.5 million in settlements and legal fees during
Hancock’s eight years in office.
A review of where each of the candidates performed best in
the May 7 election shows that Giellis performed best in the areas where many
developers had inserted projects, often against the wishes of the surrounding
neighborhoods, including Cherry Creek, Hilltop, Crestmoor, Country Club and
Virginia Village. Hancock performed best in his northeast Denver home turf as
well as outlying areas where high-density development has not yet occurred.
A major bone of contention between the candidates is the
issue of homelessness. Both opposed and voted against Initiative 300 the
so-called “Right to Survive” ballot issue which went down to a crushing defeat.
Hancock supports the “camping ban” that prevents camping overnight on city
property. Giellis does not support the ban as she believes all it does is try
to sanitize downtown and push the homeless into the local neighborhoods. She
proposes a combination of designated campsites in sanitary locations along with
tiny home locations to address the problems of homelessness.
Hancock, with a massive fundraising advantage, hopes that
his name recognition and advertising campaign will win out in the end. Giellis,
who personally toured every neighborhood in Denver, hopes her person-to-person
campaigning will defeat what she views as a cynical negative advertising blitz
being relied on by the mayor.
Endorsement: Jamie Giellis received the endorsements from former rivals Penfield Tate and Lisa Calderón on May 13, 2019. Tate and Calderón received a combined 33.18% of the votes in the May 7 election. Many experts believe these endorsements are crucial for Giellis to have a chance at defeating Michael Hancock on June 4.
The last time an incumbent mayor lost in Denver was in 1983
when a young Federico Peña defeated 74-year-old incumbent Bill McNichols.
Hancock is deemed the favorite, notwithstanding getting less than 40% of the
vote in the first round. Almost 40% of the Denver electorate turned out in the
first round which was far higher than expected. The higher the turnout the
better the chances of the challenger, according to experts, as citizens happy
with the status quo often tend not to vote.
The runoff election is set for June 4, 2019, and ballots
have already been mailed by the City and County of Denver.
302: Initiated Ordinance 302 would require a vote of Denver residents before using money or resources in an effort to obtain an Olympic bid. This will be decided by Denver voters on the June 4, 2019 ballot.
While the runoff for the next Mayor of Denver has taken most
of the media attention, there are five runoff spots for City Council as well as
the City Clerk and Recorder position on the June 4 ballot. In addition, there
is a vote on Initiated Ordinance 302 which would mandate voter approval before
Denver spends money on trying to lure the Winter Olympics to the city. The
proposition was not on the May 7 ballot as the necessary petitions were not
turned in until after the day for inclusion in that voting.
The Council runoff races are in Districts 1 (the Highlands
and Federal Boulevard area in North Denver), District 3 (West Denver including
Sloan’s Lake), District 5 (Central Southeast Denver including Hilltop and
Crestmoor), District 9 (Downtown Denver and Five Points, and District 10
(Cherry Creek and Country Club). Three of the races involve incumbents
(Districts 5, 9, and 10) which is abnormally high in a city that has upset an
incumbent only once in the last three-and-one-half decades (Espinoza over
Shepherd in District 1 in 2015). This indicates, according to some, a high
level of unhappiness on how growth has been managed in the City and County of
Denver during Michael Hancock’s eight years in office, which the City Council
in large part controls.
Clerk & Recorder: The City Clerk and Recorder position is up for grabs as former Councilman Paul Lopez (far right) will face Peg Perl in the runoff. Lopez, despite being a former councilman with name recognition, failed to get over 50% of the vote as he received only 37%. Perl finished with close to 33%.
In the runoff for City Clerk and Recorder, term-limited City
Councilman Paul Lopez drew only 37% of the vote in the first round which
surprised many election observers given his high name recognition. His personal
backing of a massive Sloan’s Lake development has been his anathema to some
voters. Others attribute Lopez’s poor showing to a disastrous debate
performance against Peg Perl who appeared to be highly qualified for the
position, while Lopez came across, at best, as amiable but incompetent for the
position.
Another surprise in the first round was the showing in
District 9 of Councilman Albus Brooks who is deemed by many the heir apparent
to Mayor Hancock. He bested challenger Candi CdeBaca in the first round by only
45% to 43%. Voters appeared upset by Brooks being too close to the business
group the Downtown Denver Partnership and high-density developers. New
developments in the district have forced many African American families who
have lived in the district for generations out of Denver.
Debates: AARP Colorado presented a series of debates featuring the candidates running for each seat in the Denver City Council races. This photo, from District 10, featured all four candidates running for the District 10 seat. City Council seats in Districts 1, 3, 5, 9, and 10 will be decided on June 4, 2019.
In District 10 incumbent Wayne New received 39% of the round
on May 7 while challenger Chris Hines attracted 30% of the vote. Some felt New
did not do enough to challenge Mayor Hancock on myriad issues in his first
term, but many fear Hines will be little more than a puppet for developers if
he were to get into office.
In Council District 1 the leader of control growth on the
Council, Rafael Espinoza elected not to run for a second term after upsetting
incumbent Susan Shepherd in 2015. He indicated he could do more outside of
Council to encourage reasonable and beneficial growth, and strongly backed his
top aide Amanda Sandoval. She is in a runoff with Denver Fire Department
Lieutenant Mike Somma who is counting on massive union support for his runoff
bid. While unions often do not heavily participate in first round elections
they do often throw in their money and manpower for runoffs.
In Council District 3 where incumbent Paul Lopez was
term-limited, immigrant rights activist Jamie Torres was the top vote getter in
round one with 40% while longtime community leader Veronica Barela received
36%. The vote may depend on the massive Sloan’s Lake development pushed by Paul
Lopez and Brownstein Farber Law Firm that is opposed by Barela and many
residents.
District 5: An election forum was held at George Washington High School on March 12, 2019. Mary Beth Susman (far right) will face off against newcomer Amanda Sawyer (second from the right). Susman, the incumbent, attracted only 36% of the vote while Sawyer received 40%.
The only incumbent to fail to win or be the top vote getter
in round one was Mary Beth Susman who attracted only 36% of the vote and was
bested by political newcomer Amanda Sawyer. Susman is viewed as highly
vulnerable for voting against residents’ wishes numerous times for high density
development in her District.
A highly interesting side note is Initiated Ordinance 302
which would require a vote of Denver residents before using money or resources
in an effort to obtain an Olympic bid. The measure was a result of an effort by
Denver to host the 2020 Winter Games which eventually gave Salt Lake City the
chance to potentially bid to host the 2030 Winter Games. While developers and some
in the business community strongly backed the bid, it was largely opposed by
many everyday citizens who saw no reason to spend potentially tens of millions
to lure growth and more people to the Denver metro area. The vote is seen as a
test of the popularity of rapid if not uncontrolled growth.
Election Day is June 4, 2019, but ballots were sent out by
mail on May 20. In the first round the voting was slow up and until election
day, May 7, when almost half of the final vote tally were turned in.
The reason a group of residents pleaded with legislators to
hold an HOA Town Hall early in April was that one of the few regulatory
measures the Colorado legislature has applied to HOAs (Home Owner Associations)
is that the property managers (community association managers, or CAMS) hired
to run them must be licensed, and that licensing law, sunsetting July 19, 2019,
was up for discussion and vote mid-April. State senators Nancy Todd and Rhonda
Fields and state representatives Mike Weissman and Janet Buckner not only
agreed to hold the HOA Town Hall on April 6, 2019, but assembled a panel of
experts for the event. Well over 100 residents attended, writing their questions
down on the 3×5 cards provided by the four legislators, who assured the
standing-room-only crowd that the cards would be kept and studied. “The
result,” said Weissman, “would be a document we will all share widely.”
Capacity Crowd: Over 100 HOA homeowners showed up for the April 6 HOA Town Hall at Heather Gardens. Most of their requests focused on: 1) more disclosure and transparency for costs such as home sale transfer fees; 2) a way to settle disputes between homeowners and their HOAs that does not involve going to court; and 3) legislative support for the above. Many expressed disbelief that solutions to these problems could be so difficult.
The panelists — attorneys Suzanne Leff and Brian Matise;
Jefferey Riester, from the state HOA office; realtor Jim Smith and homeowner
advocate Stan Hrincevich — barely made a dent in the pile of cards, most of
which voiced concern about, as a longtime Denver realtor put it, “moral and ethical
transgressions” by the very entities supposedly there to support homeowners.
When one homeowner complained that her management company refused to give her
the financial records she’d requested — and Leff, a partner at Winzenburg,
Leff, Purvis & Payne, assured the woman she has a “perfect right under the
law to those records” and suggested something the woman had already done (put
the request in writing) the audience groaned in unison.
‘I know, I know,” empathized Leff. “But I urge you to use
those avenues … when communities work well it is wonderful. I want communities
to work!”
Discussion: Senator Nancy Todd and homeowner advocate Stan Hrincevich discuss the possibility of putting enforcement capabilities into the state HOA office.
If a partner in a law firm that “practices community
association law on a daily basis” wants HOA communities to work — if
legislators, as they asserted, want HOAs to work better for homeowners — and if
homeowners desperately want their communities to work — then what is the
problem?
Up To You
One step in the direction of making HOA communities work
better was the establishment, in 2011, of the Colorado HOA Information &
Resource Center, under the Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA). This
office was originally conceived as an ombudsman, or advocate for homeowners.
Now, explained Riester, Director of Legislative Affairs for that office, “we
provide information, tell homeowners what rights they have under the law,
accept complaints and compile those complaints in a report that goes to the
General Assembly.”
“When we file a complaint with your office, it doesn’t go
anywhere,” said an older gentleman.
“At this time,” Riester said, “there are no bills that would
increase the teeth of this office to enforce complaints.”
“Short of filing suit, where can homeowners go?” asked the
gentleman.
“We don’t provide legal advice,” Reister said. “Just: these
are the facts, now it’s up to you to do what you have to do.
“Our department is currently up for sunset review,” he
added. “So please, if you think the office should have more teeth, give input.”
Hrincevich, who founded Colorado HOA Forum five years ago to
“improve HOA governance through legislative reform,” took the mic.
“Here is what you’re not being told,” he began.
Bunk
“When the HOA office was created, the law provided for that
office to investigate complaints,” Hrincevich said. “Right before the law was
complete, that was taken out.
Colorado HOA: Five years ago, Stan Hrincevich founded a homeowner advocacy group, Colorado HOA Forum, whose membership consists mostly of homeowners from Colorado’s HOAs but includes homeowners from eight other states.
“Then in 2013 the CO legislature directed a study of HOAs in
Colorado. The [resultant] study recommended that the HOA Office install out of
court dispute resolution process for homeowners.”
“You have to be very careful with alternate dispute
resolution,” interjected Matise, whose practice at BurgSimpson includes general
counsel for homeowner associations. “It would be expensive.”
“That is bunk,” Hrincevich said. “It’s bunk to say it would
cost money or be too hard. All the groundwork has been laid. Don’t need a
committee. Don’t need any further studies. We keep riding politicians to do
what the 2013 study recommended. But they ignore us.”
Profit Center
The discussion touched on various subjects like street
jurisdiction (HOAs or city?) and disabled parking spots (how to get one), to
which the panel had various, legalese-laden answers, but when the subject of
Transfer Fees arose, there was no ambiguity. Panelists and residents agreed
that the fees management companies charge for an HOA home sale were excessive
and unjustified. Jim Smith, who has penned several Denver Post columns about
“predatory transfer fees” said, “It’s nothing but a profit center for these
companies.”
“When I was about to close,” said former HOA homeowner Nancy
Markow, “I needed a status letter (showing dues currency) which I printed out
myself. But they charged $150, then charged for that letter to go through
something called Association Online, then through a company called Homeline for
an additional….”
In the end, Markow paid almost $1,000 in transfer fees.
Depending On Legislation
The discussion kept circling back to the CAM Licensing law.
The four legislators said they were in favor of continuing licensing. Buck
Bailey, a property manager, thought the current way CAMs have been licensed
wasn’t working. Weissman said, “CAM is a profession that can control your
property and your money.
“That’s why we want HB 1212 to pass,” said Weissman.
A realtor observed how much responsibility lies on the
shoulders of the HOA board, who have to negotiate contracts with the management
company, a “problem,” she said, because these volunteer homeowners “do not know
how to read a contract or have any idea of contract vocabulary.”
“These boards are running roughshod over homeowners,” said
Teri Chavez.
“Board members do just what they want … because they can,”
expostulated Candice Compton.
Panelists, acknowledging the ultimate power of HOA boards,
advised a “can’t lick ’em, join ’em” approach.
“Become more engaged,” said Matise.
“If you don’t like what’s going on,” said Weissman, “get on
the board and change it up.”
Homeowner Judy McGree Carrington protested. “You are looking
at this from a privileged perspective,” she said. “The neighborhood I’m in is
filled with working class people. They don’t have time to attend HOA meetings.
They’re coming in from work, making dinner. When they do go, they’re shouted
down.
“This is why,” emphasized Carrington, “we are depending on
legislation. Because you can’t legislate morality. But you can legislate
behavior.”
Challenge
“Before we leave,” said Hrincevich, “I would like each of
the legislators to say they’ll support a bill for out of court dispute
resolution. Without that, you can forget all about your governing documents,
your state law, because there is simply no enforcement.”
Weissman finally broke the silence. “I am not willing to
take away anyone’s right to go to court.”
Weissman was assured court would always be an option.
Buckner said, “I don’t know what the final bill will look
like so I really can’t say.”
Fields said, “I don’t think I understand the subject enough
to give you an answer,” Todd finally said, “[Homeowners] have to be protected.
We’ll figure out something,” and the room burst into applause.
“This is my 15th year as a legislator,” exclaimed Todd, who
is retiring, “and I just hope …, I never hear the word HOA again!”
Mystery
“HOAs are supposed to run on democracy,” said Teri Chavez,
“but homeowners develop apathy because it doesn’t work out that way.”
“The rampant abuse of HOA boards and management companies
will not end anytime soon if we are to depend on legislation,” said the
realtor.
The legislators, on the other hand, voiced approval of what
Fields called “a rich, thoughtful and constructive town hall.”
“I was shocked and disappointed that the legislators
wouldn’t commit to anything being asked of them, however reasonable,” said
Smith.
Hrincevich called the event “ornamental,” adding,
“Legislators know these issues. Why they don’t do anything … is a mystery. “
Many have said that the reason legislators do not respond to
homeowners’ needs is the presence of a powerful national lobby, the Community
Association Institute (CAI), which represents the interests of management
companies and HOA attorneys and other vendors benefiting from the HOA industry.
(CAI’s membership is only 2% homeowners.)
One week after the HOA Town Hall, Hrincevich viewed a letter
national CAI sent to its Colorado membership: that read in part, “We need you
to email or call members of the Finance Committee and let them know you support
HB 1212.” The letter explained how the bill had been “preamended” and “is the
version we support.” The letter promised, “Bonus points if you can testify!”
“All our recommended changes were ignored,” Hrincevich said,
“resulting in an ineffective licensing program. But CAI and special interests
were able to preamend this bill. In other words, the industry that is to be
regulated has successfully influenced the sponsors of this bill to include
their interests. Is this the way government is supposed to work for the
people?”