by Charles Bonniwell
Mayor Michael Hancock’s appointment of CRL Associates lobbyist and former councilwoman Allegra “Happy” Haynes as newest executive director of the Denver Department of Parks and Recreation has been met with widespread criticism from across the Denver political spectrum.
An expensive national search was undertaken by the city for the new parks executive director headed up by a 10 person search committee which included Haynes. Denver Mayor Michael Hancock brought the search to a sudden halt declaring that he was simply going to appoint his long-term political ally to the $139,500 position without further ado. He declared sua spointe to the surprise of the search committee that “she is going to make one dynamic, awesome director of the city parks and recreation.”
Others were less enthusiastic about her appointment. Park advocate Trish Abbott noted, “She comes in the great tradition of Wellington Webb’s first appointment to the position, Charles Roberts, who went to jail for stealing a grease trap from the parks department to put in an A&W he had an interest in over in Aurora. The appointment demonstrates how little this mayor cares what the citizens of the city think. I would like to think this is the lowest of the low but we have got many more years ahead of us with Mayor Hancock.”
Denver historian Phil Goodstein declared, “Hancock has clearly shown he has a thorough contempt for parks and quiet open space. On the contrary, Hancock demands parks become commercial ventures. Where possible, he has even been ready to sell them off.”
As for Haynes, Goodstein opined, “She has been part of the nefarious machine of CRL Associates, a lobbying firm which puts Brownstein Hyatt to shame in terms of directing city council and assuring the adoption of very bad policy . . . If anything, Haynes is the personification of old institutional Denver: smug self-centered, utterly linked to the Democrats, and having no conception that any alternatives are possible.”
Few individuals were willing to go on the record praising her appointment although City Councilman Albus Brooks, a political ally of Mayor Hancock and Haynes declared that Haynes is “a stateswoman of Denver” who is well equipped to deal with the “complexity and the politics” of the job.”
Upon assuming the job Haynes declared that the job was “an appointment of a lifetime” although at age 62 she is approaching the normal retirement age for Denver employees.
Haynes has quickly become mired in controversy as she does not wish to give up her position as president of the Board of Directors for Denver Public Schools. She is up for re-election this November.
Denver Attorney Joe Halpern indicated that “Happy Haynes was a prime mover in the destruction of the Hentzell Park Natural Area. She advocated for the land swap as a Denver Public Schools board member.”
Community activist Dave Felice was not pleased by the appointment and her desire to hold two positions noting, “How can we expect better from someone who was in favor of giving away 11.5 acres of Hampden Heights North (Hentzell) Park?”
While some individuals publicly raised the question of finding serious conflicts of interest in being both the executive director of Denver and president of the Denver School Board, Haynes does not. She said, “During
the day, I’ll devote my work time to my role in Parks and Recreation,” and her nights she would work on being the president of the School Board. She has requested an advisory opinion from the Denver Ethics Board. That Board has come under fire itself for failing to find conflicts of interest in various other cases involving members of the Hancock administration including Planning Board head Brad Buchanan and interim Parks head Scott Gilmore and his wife Councilwoman Stacy Gilmore.
Trish Abbott noted, “I don’t see a problem. Ms. Haynes is best known for doing what she is told although with no small degree of utter incompetency. I am sure she can do two jobs very badly as easy as she can one. She is after all an all purpose political hack. In either position she is simply doing whatever the mayor or the people that control him want done, so I don’t see any conflict of interest. Moreover the Denver Ethics Board has indicated by and large that conflicts of interest don’t really exist as a theoretical concept in Denver government these days under Mayor Hancock no matter how blatant.”
Some citizens in Denver have indicated that they believe the entire Parks Department is under the control of lobbyists for real estate developers. When the Parks Advisory Board opposed Mayor Hancock’s giveaway of undesignated parkland in Hentzell Park he began to replace its members with real estate lobbyists like Marcus Pachner and Happy Haynes’ sister Khadija Haynes.
Regarding the appointment of Happy Haynes as executive director of Denver Parks, Joe Halpern stated, “She is the proverbial fox in the henhouse.”
Increasingly some good government advocates in Denver see the only solution to the destruction of the Denver Parks and Recreation Department is to advocate for voter approved Charter changes to limit the powers of the mayor. Joe Felice suggested, “Perhaps it is time for an elected independent park commission to take these decisions away from the mayor’s office.”
Trish Abbott and some other park advocates indicate that they concur with Felice’s concept. Whether they can make a vote a reality is an open question according to political insiders.