by Charles Bonniwell | Oct 22, 2021 | Feature Story Bottom Left
Yes it was on Friday the 13th, a day steeped in mythology as a day of ill omens, in March of 2020, that President Donald J. Trump speaking in the White House Rose Garden, declared a national emergency that could free up $50 billion to help fight the pandemic and said that he was empowering the secretary of Health and Human Services to waive certain laws and regulations to ensure that the COVID-19 virus can be contained and patients treated.
“To unleash the full power of the federal government … I am officially declaring a national emergency,” Trump said.
“Two very big words,” he added.
Yes, they were and marked the beginning of the end to his presidency. The concept was to institute on a state-by-state basis lockdowns, mask mandates, and social distancing so that COVID-19 cases would be spread over a longer period so that ICU beds and ventilator machines would not be overwhelmed. All we had to do was go on a stay-at-home vacation for 15 days and all would be well. Approaching the two-year anniversary of that declaration we cannot be amazed at our overwhelming naiveté.
The result was a long-term worldwide recession, the loss of personal freedom, and liberty throughout the once called “Free World” from Italy to Australia, and the imposition of the “dictatorship of the public health bureaucracy.” If Karl Marx had only realized that the overthrow of democracy and capitalism did not require a bloody revolution but simply a public health mandate, we could have saved tens of millions of lives. In China, the apparent source of COVID-19, and the only remaining major country with a communist government, perhaps they did. They closed the city of Wuhan, China, from the rest of China but opened Wuhan up to the rest of the world. No COVID-19 recession for China but a recession for the rest of the world. Brilliant!
Of course, Trump was not the only politician to egregiously suffer due to that fateful Friday the 13th. Democrat New York Governor Andrew Cuomo initially rode the COVID-19 wave to great adulation, even garnering an International Emmy for his daily COVID briefings. In the end, however, he had to resign in disgrace in part from of the discovery that his dictates that nursing homes had to take in contiguous COVID-19 patients cost thousands of lives, which he fraudulently tried to hide. The coup de grâce came with the revelation that the so-called “LuvGov” was, in fact, a serial sexual harasser.
But what if Trump had ignored the advice from ever contradicting Dr. Anthony Fauci and the highly political Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and rode through the Ides of March doing nothing but shepherding through the development and distribution of vaccines for COVID-19. The one European country that ignored all of the lockdown mandates and impingements on civil liberties was surprisingly, Sweden, headed by the Swedish Social Democratic Party. From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Public Health Agency, Folkhälsomyndigheten, embarked on a de-facto herd immunity approach, allowing community transmission to occur relatively unchecked. There were no mandatory measures taken to limit crowds on public transport, in shopping malls, or in other crowded venues, while recommending only a limit of 50 people for gatherings. Sweden’s mortality rates were lower than the European Union and the United States and its economy prospered.
In America, states like Nebraska, Wyoming, and Florida, which limited and quickly lifted COVID-19 restrictions appear to have weathered comparatively well when put up against highly restrictive states such as New York and California. Colorado, under Governor Polis, took a somewhat middle ground and at least did not go with the Draconian measures adopted by states such as Michigan, under the leadership of Governor Whitmer. In Denver we did get to see up close and personal the hypocrisy of the political elites when Mayor Hancock was at DIA texting to city employees not to travel over the Thanksgiving holidays, while he was heading to Texas and Mississippi to spend the holidays with family.
Was it all worth it? The autocrats and authoritarians and their admirers on the left and right will tell you it was. They certainly learned how easy it is to cower and control a populace. But at least for some the lesson learned is that next time they tell us the equivalent of it is just “15 days to flatten the curve” we know what they mean. It is time to again destroy liberty and freedom for as long as they can possibly get away with it.
— Editorial Board
by Charles Bonniwell | Sep 27, 2021 | Feature Story Bottom Left
Golden Rule: Phil Anschutz, Colorado’s wealthiest man.
The Colorado Republican Party met down in Pueblo for its fall meeting to consider whether to opt-out of the state run primary. The prominent Democrats had funded statewide referendums called Propositions 107 and 108 back in 2016, which made for Presidential primaries (107) and for open primaries for all others partisan elections (108) whereby unaffiliated voters would receive ballots from both parties and could choose one.
Similar measures had been passed in California and Utah, which mandated acceptance by the parties. Such mandates were found to be unconstitutional in federal courts so this time the provision was made where a political party could opt-out provided 75% of all its State Central Committee (the “SCC”) voted every two years in the fall to do so. Because of its extraordinary high percentage of all members, not just those voting, opting out is almost impossible.
Does this pass constitutional muster? Not according to virtually everyone from conservative legal scholar John Eastman to the liberal Legal Director of the Colorado ACLU Mark Silverstein. A group of grassroot Republicans who are members of the SCC (including the publisher of this paper) began touring the state to convince fellow members of the SCC to vote for opt-out of Proposition 108 at the fall meeting.
The merry band of grassroot activists did not do so because they thought they could achieve the nearly impossible task of getting 75% of all the SCC members to opt-out. In fact, 75% of all the members seldom even attend the fall meeting. The activists did so to get the leadership to act on the issue and bring suit in federal court to determine once all for all the unconstitutionality of Proposition 108.
Somewhat improbably the campaign caught fire and began to attract backers across the state. The Republican SCC is composed of 520 members which includes all state House and Senate legislators who are Republicans as well as the Republican Chair, Vice Chair, and Secretary of each of the 64 counties, as well as bonus members from the more populated counties.
Adherents for the opt-out included State Representatives Dave Williams, Matt Soper, Patrick Neville, Stephanie Luck, and Ron Hanks, former U.S. Congressman Tom Tancredo, Republican National Committeeman and radio host Randy Corporon, State Party Vice Chair Priscilla Rahm, and State Party Secretary Marilyn Harris.
But then came the counterattack from the Republican Party establishment who have controlled the Republican Party for over 20 years, and who dislike the grassroot Republicans more than the farthest left Democrats. The Colorado Republican Party has been, and is, controlled by one person, the state’s richest man, billionaire Phil Anschutz. Very few grassroots Republicans were ever actually aware of this fact.
Anschutz is the owner of the Broadmoor Resort in Colorado Springs, among many other business enterprises, including the NHL’s Los Angeles Kings and Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG). He also controls the Colorado Springs Gazette newspaper and the blog sites Colorado Politics and the Denver Gazette. He is also rumored to be the biggest contributor to the Denver free market think tank, the Independence Institute, which in turn controls Complete Colorado a news aggregator.
The Discovery: Grassroots Republicans discover that Phil Anschutz is the man behind the curtain in Republican politics.
Anschutz never publicly expresses his political views and works behind the scenes through layers of intermediators. It is believed that he is not a Trump fan, and he is what was once called a “Rockefeller Republican.” His hires for editors and reporters at Colorado Politics and Denver Gazette are almost all left of center liberals and mostly laid off former Denver Post employees. His publications regularly attack grassroot politicians like former State House minority leader Patrick Neville while writing endless puff pieces on moderate Republicans like two-time failed gubernatorial candidate Bob “Both Ways” Beauprez.
The content of his publications tends to be almost no different than The Denver Post except for occasionally having moderate Republicans write opinion pieces. It is believed he has come to accept Democrat hegemony over the state governments of California and Colorado, where most of his business enterprises are located. He has figured out how to have his businesses thrive in such environments.
He clearly didn’t like the opt-out idea and all of a sudden, every one of his publications went on the attack and opposed the opt-out. Even though the Independence Institute’s Jon Caldera is not a Republican and now votes in Democrat primaries, he wrote an editorial condemning the opt-out and then emailed pleas to 520 members of the Republican SCC to vote no on the opt-out. The same for 710 KNUS host Jimmy Sengenberger who has been financially supported by Anschutz organizations. Anschutz even had the Colorado Gazette issue a scathing editorial on the eve of the Republican fall meeting condemning the opt-out vote.
In the end, the opt-out vote failed by a 60% to 40% margin of those attending the fall meeting. It was short of the required 75% of all members of the entire SCC. Ultimately, however, the grassroots won. They were able to get over 75% of the members to attend the fall meeting forcing the State Chair Kristi Burton Brown to even have a vote. Following that failed vote a motion and a resolution were passed almost unanimously demanding the party be a plaintiff to a federal lawsuit to overturn Proposition 108 and set up a separate fund to support such a lawsuit.
Anschutz won the opt-out battle but lost the war. Undoubtedly, Anschutz will try to scuttle the lawsuit too, but it is not clear he will be able to do so. Perhaps, more importantly grassroot Republicans have been able at long last to pull the curtain aside and see who their “Wizard of Oz” opponent really is.
by Charles Bonniwell | Jul 23, 2021 | Main Articles
by Charles Bonniwell
More Trouble: The office of the Denver DA has opened a formal investigation into DPS Board Member Tay Anderson’s unlawfully soliciting and receiving gifts.
As reported in the May 2021 edition of the Glendale Cherry Creek Chronicle, a criminal complaint was filed on behalf of Campaign Integrity Watchdog by Matt Arnold. Arnold alleged that Anderson repeatedly violated C.R.S. Sec. 24-6-203 by soliciting and receiving, but not reporting, gifts totaling thousands of dollars. He did so through GoFundMe pages for everything from trips to Washington, D.C., to purported medical expenses from allegedly being pushed to the ground at the Colorado State Capitol during a protest. Anderson also solicited baby shower gifts on Target’s Baby Registry page.
After Anderson refused to answer intervention letters sent out to Anderson’s multiple addresses, Chief Deputy District Attorney at Denver DA, Joe Morales, reviewed the case again and assigned the case to Senior Criminal & Civil Investigator Kent Prose. In response, Anderson initiated an even more brazen scheme. He sent an email to his thousands of supporters declaring:
Campaign Integrity Watchdog had sent a similar complaint to the Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswald, who dismissed the same, and Anderson had celebrated that dismissal in an April 29, 2021 email. At a July 14, 2021, press conference located at Brother Jeff’s Cultural Center, Anderson announced he was returning to his full schedule as a board member of Denver Public Schools (DPS) notwithstanding that the investigation into claims of 60 plus young women that he had allegedly sexually assaulted or harassed had not been completed.
Capitol Incident: Anderson solicited gifts on a GoFundMe page for purported medical expenses stemming from allegedly being pushed to the ground at a protest at the state capitol on July 29, 2020.
DPS had appointed Investigations Law Group to look into all the claims against Anderson, including the one brought by Black Lives Matter 5280, and those referenced by Mary Katherine Brooks Fleming before the Colorado House Judiciary Committee on May 5, 2021.
Anderson claimed that the group had indicated that its investigation would take only 30 days but had taken longer. He also slammed the media indicating it was “complicit in the white supremacists’ attacks that have happened to my family.” He also asserted that he had contemplated suicide because of the hateful threats and comments.
The Denver District Attorney’s office has declined to indicate whether or not it has opened a separate investigation on Anderson regarding the claims of sexual assault and harassment.
by Charles Bonniwell | Jun 25, 2021 | Editorials
If you enjoy only getting your news about local stories from the innocuous, politically correct viewpoint of today’s Denver Post you will be glad to know that may soon be essentially the only point of view available. The Denver Post was not always bland and politically correct and, in fact, it was just the opposite when it was owned and operated by two hustlers named Harry Tannen and Frederic Bonfils in 1895. The coverage was not exactly fair and balanced under their tutelage, but it was certainly sensational. It was an absolute must-read seven days a week.
Of course, not everyone enjoyed the coverage. One lawyer went to their offices and repeatedly shot both men. He was never convicted but Tannen and Bonfils were found to have jury tampered in the third trial. Another lawyer went to their offices and horsewhipped both men. A wonderful book on the glory days of the Post is Bill Hosokawa’s Thunder in the Rockies.
The paper did not get to its present emaciated state overnight, but it is now owned by a New York hedge fund, Alden Global Capital, that could care less about the content of the paper, and only cutting costs and squeezing every penny of profit possible.
A group of laid off reporters and editors started the digital Colorado Sun which, of course, reflects the viewpoint of the paper where they learned their craft. Now the Colorado Sun has a partnership with a new local non-profit, National Trust for Local Trust, has acquired 24 Denver metro newspapers including the 153-year-old Golden Transcript, as well as such other well-known local papers as Life on Capitol Hill, Washington Park Profile, Littleton Independent, and Englewood Herald.
Larry Ryckman, a former Denver Post editor and now editor-in-chief of the Colorado Sun told NPR that the “Colorado Sun . . . will drive [all 24] newspapers editorially” in what he and the other former Denver Post employees deem “the public good.” Oh, boy! We can’t wait for all 24 newspapers to be exactly the same editorially as the Colorado Sun and The Denver Post.
But wait you say? What about Colorado Politics and the Denver Gazette owned through a corporation by billionaire and Republican donor Phil Anschutz? Well, it appears that Mr. Anschutz believes that the only way to make money in the media business in this area is to mimic The Denver Post. So those sites, editor-at-large, Vince Bzdek, is a former Denver Post editor and its new managing editor, Linda Shipley, was, you guessed it, the managing editor for The Denver Post. Most of its reporters like Joey Bunch are also former Denver Post reporters.
The content of the Colorado Politics and Denver Gazette is basically identical to The Denver Post except for an occasional bland conservative op-ed or a puff piece on some has-been establishment Republican like Bob “Both Ways” Beauprez.
The homogenization of the news was recently highlighted when the annual Western Conservative Summit came back to town. Local self-identified communists and anarchist groups decided to have some fun punching out blue haired ladies, verbally harassing old men, and blocking downtown traffic. The Denver Post and its many offspring reported nothing as they know men and women of the Left only protest peacefully.
In the Denver market only Westword covered the mayhem having not yet been purchased by the Colorado Sun and its financing partner. Another independent paper The Villager appears to have survived the attempt to shut it down when its April Fool’s Day story was apparently not politically correct enough.
Below is a picture of the Western Conservative Summit outdoor festivities courtesy of the out-of-town news site, the Washington Times. There may come a time in the not-too-distant future where controversial stories will be covered, if at all, by only out-of-state news organizations.
by Charles Bonniwell | May 26, 2021 | Editorials
Mark Twain famously said: “If voting made any difference, they wouldn’t let us do it.” His remarks certainly apply to Colorado today as the new Colorado Transportation Bill SB21-260 demonstrates. Colorado voters have repeatedly declared, since 1992 with the adoption of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (“TABOR”), that they wanted to be able to vote on approving new tax increases. Similarly, Colorado taxpayers have repeatedly said that they do not want new taxes for roads. In fall of 2019, Proposition CC failed which would have allowed the state to keep the refunds that would have otherwise gone back to taxpayers under TABOR for roads. In the fall of 2020, voters turned down two Propositions, 109 and 110, which would have raised taxes for roads. In addition the voters approved Proposition 117, a measure requiring voter approval on fee hikes that generate more than $100 million in revenue over five years.
None of it mattered in the least. Under SB21-260 the state legislature imposes an estimated $4 billion in new fees over 10 years for so-called transportation needs. That is an estimated $1,750 per household. How did they do it? Well, they divided the fees into four different enterprises, none of them individually exceeds the limit. One other fee, however, easily exceeded the limit, but they put that fee into a Highway Users Tax Fund, and since it is not an enterprise, it does not need voter approval.
One would think the Colorado courts would strike down such shenanigans, but we are assured by the conservative Independence Institute that the Colorado Supreme Court would find a way to approve the same. Given the black eye the Colorado judiciary has gotten from the discovery that the Judicial Department and Colorado’s former chief justice awarded a multimillion dollar contract to an employee to prevent her from disclosing incidents of workplace misconduct and sex discrimination, the courts might want the citizens to at least think they are not so biased that they can render impartial rulings, but apparently not.
The solution the Independence Institute gives us, is that ultimately the voters can punish those legislators who passed the legislation over the wishes of the voters. But in Colorado that has become a joke. Mail-in ballots and ballot harvesting in Denver make it impossible for anybody but a Democrat to win statewide office and assures a Democrat controlled State House and State Senate. That is why the State Legislature could care less what the voters want or do not want.
There is at least a silver lining in all of this. Voters have indicated that they do not want new taxes or new fees used to build and repair roads and bridges, and under SB21-260 very little of the money will be used for that. It is estimated the roads and bridges will be involved in only 17% to 18% of the spending and rest used for subsidies for electric cars and multimodal transportation. So, after a flurry of spending the roads in Colorado will remain highly congested and in poor repair. Nothing will change except the lightening of the public pockets.
You could, of course, call your duly elected state representative/senator but many of them are not even bothering these days to take such calls or read constituent mail. Why should they? In case you have not figured it out yet, you don’t live in a democratic republic in Colorado, but an interesting form of an oligarchy. You can have fun voting, relieved of any burden that your vote, as Mark Twain noted, “makes any difference.”
— Editorial Board
