“All human beings are my neighbors. We share the same planet.” — Ana Monnar
by Luke Schmaltz
By mid-March of this year, a new reality had descended upon Denver, as the COVID-19 lockdown forced residents to curtail social behavior, forgo daily objectives and divert vocational routines in never-before-seen ways. As thousands of “non-essential” workers were forced from their jobs and directed by government officials to stay at home, the Denver Department of Public Works continued to operate as usual. The ever-elusive “ticket ninjas” crept along their daily routes, issuing citations for meter violations, time-limit abuses and parking in prohibited areas on street sweeping day offenses.
Neighborly Gestures
After grapevine investigation, it was discovered that some of these anti-citation signs were the work of a local artist known as Rez, who explains, “ I decided to make the signs because I know personally that the street sweeping catches me off guard, especially in the spring. I figured I was not the only one, and if I could help out a few neighbors and essential hospital personnel, it was worth making a couple of signs.” Although obstructing street sweeping is a fine-able offense, the actual presence of these machines is an urban mystery. Rez continues, “I think I saw a street sweeper that last day [last year] it was supposed to clean our street.”
With extra time on their hands, some residents of the Baker district decided not to take the untimely, insensitive issuance of parking tickets sitting down. In a bold, First Amendment-inspired move, locals began taking matters into their own hands and warning neighbors, locally employed professionals and other passers-through to be mindful of the cruel, merciless scourge of Denver meter maids. By the time street sweeping day came around in the first week of April, several sidewalks featured homemade signs warning that the citation hammer was afoot and set to drop on anyone and everyone parked on the wrong side of the street.
Residents aim to warn neighbors about costly tickets with fines that can quickly triple.
The Pen Is Mighty
Small Infraction, Massive Price
The consequences for non-payment of a parking ticket can be severe. Essentially, the issuance of a ticket initiates a process that, if not complied with, can result in the city commandeering (impounding) your vehicle with no obligation to return it. Rather, it could be held for months accruing ever-increasing fees and fines, and finally sold at auction for a fraction of its value so that the paltry revenue can be absorbed into a corpulent government bureaucracy.
Rapid Escalation
The average parking ticket in Denver cites the vehicle owner anywhere from $25 to $50. If not paid within 20 days, the fine doubles — making the vehicle eligible to be fitted with a wheel clamp and/or towed away. After 60 days, a collection fee is added and credit bureaus are notified, and after 120 days a default judgment is entered against whomever the vehicle is registered to — stating that all fines and fees must be paid by legal mandate. Finally, after one year, the file is turned over to a law firm which then pursues
aggressive private collection. An article published by The Denver Post in September 2019 reported that annual parking fee revenues for the previous year were in excess of $27 million. Believe it or not, that was the lowest figures reported in almost a decade. With that sort of money sitting in the city’s coffers, all streets should be free of potholes, every stoplight should sparkle, and shine and every street sign should be polished to a squeaky-clean sheen.
Shame Of The City
While Denver is known for many great things such as the Broncos and a certain omelet of the same name, it is also known for the infamous Denver boot. The aforementioned “wheel clamp” is deployed to disable any vehicle linked to unpaid parking violations. This blatant violation of Fourth Amendment rights (unreasonable searches and seizures) has spread to municipalities across the nations, giving the Mile-High City an unfair name among unfortunate motorists nationwide. Parking fines and additional fees notwithstanding, having a boot on a car entitles the owner to pay yet another fee to have it removed.
Supply And Demand
While parking enforcement has its place in keeping bike lanes and jogging paths obstruction-free, the aggressive policy of writing tickets, doubling fines and confiscating private property seems altogether overkill — especially in the midst of a pandemic — thus the vigilant residential blowback. As mentioned above, the issuance of tickets across Denver has leveled out over the last couple of years. The reason being for this? The economy was so good that the Department of Public Works couldn’t find enough people to fill all the parking agent positions — shedding light on what must be a truly lousy job.
Eight months out of the year, parking tickets are issued once a month to cars parked in the way of “street sweeping.”
A Temporary Standstill
Now that one-third of the labor force has been couched, the city probably won’t have trouble filling those empty ticket agent positions. Yet, for every hypervigilant meter maid scuttling about ruining people’s afternoons, there will be several dozen unemployed residents like Rez with enough time on their hands to post homemade signs warning others about being ticketed. Thankfully, by mid-April in this strangest of years, the issuance of parking tickets seemed to have dwindled even further. Perhaps city officials finally gave in to their human instincts to have a bit of mercy for their fellow citizens in the midst of a crisis.
One thing is for sure, though — as soon as things level out and the pandemic subsides — the ticket patrol will be back in full force … but so will Rez.
“We are kept keen on the grindstone of pain and necessity.” — H.G. Wells, The Time Machine
by Luke Schmaltz
The recent government-mandated closure of non-essential businesses derailed the economy like an F-5 tornado blindsiding a freight train, a manmade construct forced to bend to the unflinching will of nature.
The current fiscal catastrophe is — as some economists are predicting — the harbinger of an impending recession or perhaps even worse. Regardless, some Denver businesses owners and entrepreneurs are determined to adapt to these incredible circumstances and find a way to survive.
Wings To Go: Amidst the Covid-19 pandemic, the takeout-only model has proven to be viable for businesses such as Fire on the Mountain in Wash Park and Sloans Lake.
Many national brands across various industries are thriving like never before. Some include Zoom (video conferencing platform), Tushy (portable bidet maker), Drizly (delivery of adult beverages), Cleancult (organic cleaning products), GrubHub (restaurant delivery) and many more. Similarly, many local businesses are shifting direction to keep their sails unfurled amid chaotic tradewinds. While some have reconfigured operations, others have simply been in the right place at the right time.
It’s no secret that businesses such as grocery stores, liquor stores, marijuana dispensaries and gun vendors have multiplied their sales exponentially over the past month. Less surprising, however, are dine-in restaurants doing takeout only, custom clothiers, local breweries and bicycle repair shops who have found new revenue streams.
Ramping Up Takeout
The dine-in aspect of food service is widely employed because table service facilitates higher ticket averages than to-go orders. Yet, the takeout-only model has proven to be viable for fast food brands and independent restaurateurs alike. While most establishments without a takeout dimension to their business model are shuttered, a few holdouts have managed to pare down operations, shift focus and continue serving a populace that shows no sign of losing its taste for professionally-prepared cuisine.
While the upheaval is nothing short of devastating for most, Fire on the Mountain has managed to harness the inertia of a disaster for life-saving revenues. Manager Craig “Cheech” Oberlink explains how FOTM’s current solvency is based on a deep-rooted connection to the community, “The neighborhoods we are in are super-supportive and family-centric.” Both FOTM Denver establishments are leveraging their “ready to go-centric” offerings for takeout-only service. Rather than dilute their revenues by accessing GrubHub or UberEats, they have opted to keep the revenue stream in-house. Staff members are the delivery drivers, bringing hot wings and brand favorite Vegan Mac-and-Cheese-Balls to loyal customers. As Highlands employee Aaron Howell puts it, “I feel that I am doing important work by feeding people and they [FOTM] create a culture that facilitates that.”
Fire on the Mountain treats people well and fosters loyal employees and patrons.
Although FOTM has had to pare down, those left with jobs such as Howell are grateful. “They have done so much for me that I am willing to lean into this crisis, help out
however I can. I feel the same way about them as I feel about my own family. Everyone has to pick up an oar and row the boat.” Meanwhile Oberlink — an industry veteran — remains cautiously optimistic, “It feels good to keep people employed and to see the neighborhood support the restaurant. A lot of places can’t stay open so we feel super lucky.” Sales are not what they were a month ago, yet FOTM seems to have struck an affable nerve within the community. Oberlink recounts a recent morning, “I showed up to work and there was a big heart cut out of cardboard taped to our door that said ‘Stay Strong.’”
Good Neighbors
Esters Pub is grateful to serve a reciprocal community.
The notion of appreciative patrons is apparent, as Esters Neighborhood Pubs are feeling the crunch but not the cold shoulder. Owner Paul Sullivan explains, “The community and our neighborhood have been absolutely amazing in supporting us and continuing to call in orders. There’ve been so many touching moments from customers including dropping off face masks for our coworkers, randomly buying lunch for front line workers, multiple tips of over 100%, buying large gift cards just to support the restaurant and the list goes on. It has made me realize that Esters and this community is so much more than the dollars and cents of the situation. Even though this pandemic has been terrible for a lot of people, I am humbled and grateful for the amount of kindness I have been witnessing.”
Mask Production
Equilibrium Clothing has shifted focus to serve local heroes.
Heroes in the trenches of the fight against COVID-19 work in essential capacities — most importantly in hospitals. By March 19, signs were pointing to the grim reality that the pandemic had the potential to catch the frontline off guard. On March 19, Deb Henriksen — owner/operator of Equillibrium Clothing — contacted an associate working as an ER nurse at St. Joseph’s Hospital to gain an informed perspective. She quickly discovered that essential personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies were running dangerously low. Henriksen jumped into action and began making multiple-use masks from hemp and bamboo textiles she had on hand. The impetus was to deliver immediate support in a “sew-it-forward” gesture of community service bolstered by long-earned brand integrity. She furthered her efforts to support the Athena Mask Project — informed by her role as an online teacher at Rocky Mountain College of Art and Design (RMCAD). Online sales of Equillibrium Face Masks have since spiked, and she pledges to continue giving away one mask to those in need for each sold and to donate 10% of revenue to sustainable initiatives. Henriksen attests, “The sales keep my work essential and going, I am very grateful for that. I know there are many people out of work, and I cannot say the same thing.” She also adds, “ I have been deeply touched by the appreciation of what I am doing from those who receive masks. It brings great joy in a time of sadness to help out others.”
Mockery Brewing offers craft beer convenience with curbside pickup.
Closing The Gap
Just as a beer can opens and the drinker pulls it to their lips, so too do libations at large have to make their way to the intended recipients. Yet, bars are shut down —interrupting the supply chain from producer to consumer by cutting out the all-important, confluence of social drinking. Local breweries are facing plummeting sales to the tune of 80%, yet stalwarts like Mockery Brewing forge forth — offering curbside pickup of crowlers and bottles of their 14 selections of beers. This is a trying time that has brought out the best in some people. Owner/Brewer Zach Rabun explains, “We have seen some truly generous tipping from a handful of customers. This is a great boon to both our bartenders and
overall morale. We have also had a lot of our suppliers reach out to see how they can reorganize to best support our needs.” As the social dynamics shift, Rabun and his staff remain flexible in order to accommodate their customers. “We set up an online portal to allow people to make pre-orders before stopping by the brewery, as well as request deliveries. This has kept everything running very smoothly and prevented lines from forming, thereby avoiding any social distancing issues. Since the majority of our sales are coming in the form of crowler orders, we have been able to offer our full selection of beers.”
Upcycle
All bicycle repair shops such as Totem Cyclery and Base Camp Cyclery are operating on an appointment-only basis. Yet, the stay-at-home decree has prompted desktop dynamos and cubicle curmudgeons alike to turn themselves into overnight athletes. Local bike shops are reporting record numbers of requests for repairs and upgrades. In the midst of mass death — lazy people are, alas, trying to get healthy. Specialized boutique tune-up shops are becoming Hipster Jiffy lubes and Yuppie Grease monkeys. This shift reveals the urge within many who make that New Year’s resolution to get in shape and lose that unnecessary weight to actually do it.
Base Camp Cyclery helps people get rolling again.
Perhaps in the pursuit of treating ourselves better, we can learn how to treat one another with the same respect, dignity and grace. A major shift is at work. The pandemic is local. To live through it as a community, we must eat well, be kind, breathe pure, drink locally and ride with purpose.
The Denver Public School system is seemingly hell-bent on embedding a sense of irony into its students.
skills of children and the awareness of the world in which they live are systematically countering those efforts by exposing kids to potentially toxic levels of lead.
A Well-documented Threat
It is known throughout the developed world that lead can be harmful and even fatal to human beings — especially children. Yet, its presence remains in the water flowing into many schools (and homes) in Denver, across Colorado and throughout most urban sectors of the United States.
Old Buildings: Long standing buildings, like Denver’s East High School built in 1924, sit atop buried poison.
According to a recently published “key facts” page on the World Health Organization (WHO) website: “Young children are particularly vulnerable to lead poisoning because they absorb 4–5 times as much ingested lead as adults from a given source.” The report goes on to describe a series of effects exposure to lead can have on kids, stating “… lead can affect children’s brain development resulting in reduced intelligence quotient (IQ), behavioral changes such as reduced attention span and increased antisocial behavior, and reduced educational attainment.” Further, the WHO states that lead exposure causes renal impairment, anemia, hypertension, immunotoxicity and damage to reproductive organs and that all effects — be they behavioral or neurological — are irreversible.
The Underlying Problem
The primary source of lead-tainted water that is being pumped into drinking fountains, sinks and kitchen areas in schools lies hidden. It does not come from the municipal source, rather, it is picked up in the service lines running from the main municipal water conduit and into a network of pipes made of — you guessed it — lead. Most buildings erected (approximately) between the late 1940s and the early 1980s are serviced by lead pipes. While proactive measures in places like Madison, Wisconsin, and Lansing, Michigan, have completely removed lead pipes from beneath homes and schools, the American Water Works Association estimates that six million lead service lines remain in use nationwide — affecting anywhere from 15 to 22 million people. Additionally, the presence of lead in school drinking water can come from pipe fittings, fixtures and the soldering in brass pipe joints.
Tainted Water: Retrofitted filters can temporarily block tainted water.
As far as Colorado is concerned and Denver in particular, many schools in current operation were built between the “lead window” cited above and contain some if not all of the lead-leaching components mentioned thereafter. The WHO and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) both contend that no level of lead in drinking water is safe for children. Similarly, Zeke Campbell, Denver Water Director of Water Quality and Treatment, states on the DPS Takes Proactive Approach to Lead Testing Video that: “There is no safe level of lead. The most important thing you can do is have a test done.” Visit the following website to view the video: https://facilities.dpsk12.org/ 2016/11/21/leadtesting2017/.
Meanwhile, the EPA claims that water containing any measure that is at or below 15 parts per billion (PPB) is safe for human consumption — even children. Recently, Denver Water conducted a comprehensive testing initiative of all drinking water fixtures across the entire Denver Public School system. Over 3,300 samples from 160 schools were tested which revealed that most facilities have traces of lead in the majority of their faucets, drinking fountains and kitchen fixtures — some revealing levels of lead near or past the 15 PPB minimum set by the EPA. Water fountains and bottle filling stations testing near 15 PPB were partitioned off and retrofitted with filters which, while offering a temporary solution, do not remove the fact that there are lead pipes beneath the school structure. Ironically (once again), the EPA is the government agency which must grant Denver Water permission to dig up, remove and replace the underground pipes — a project with a price tag in the hundreds of millions.
An Ambitious Plan
Recently, Colorado Public Radio and The Denver Post cited article have reported that Denver Water has presented a plan to the EPA for doing exactly that. Beginning sometime in 2020 (theoretically) the plan would “issue tens of thousands of water filters … make adjustments to water chemistry, increasing the pH value from 7.8 to 8.8 and replace all lead lines in all areas served by Denver Water.” While this initiative undoubtedly springs from good intentions, none of the above measures can commence without pending EPA approval.
Standards: The EPA sets the standards, yet hinders progress
A precursor to this solution was proposed last year by the Colorado Department of Health and Environment. The proposal has been criticized because it called for Denver Water adding orthophosphate to the entire municipal water supply. While this element is an algae growth-promoting nutrient, it can also be harmful in high doses. The measure is already in use in Philadelphia, New York City, and Washington, D.C., and has reduced lead levels because orthophosphate clings to the inside of lead pipes — forming a sort of barrier between the water and the would-be leaching lead. However, it has been determined that it would cost a fortune to purchase, treat the water, then extract it from the effluent before adding it all over again — far more than simply replacing the lead pipes.
The plan was scrapped for the current strategy of testing fixtures and installing filters while Denver Water waits for the EPA to approve the pending proposal. Meanwhile, students and teachers hope the water filters are being changed at the appropriate intervals. Any student or teacher who does not bring pre-filtered water from home risks absorbing an unhealthy or even dangerous level of lead.
Under the current Denver Zoning Code 11.12.2.1.B.2 (DZC), the number of people who can live together as a household (who are not related by blood) is limited to just two. While this does not include blood relatives or persons under 18, it places tangible parameters on what is commonly known as a “single-family home.”
Flop Houses Of Yesteryear: Rooming house dynamics of yore have come to the fore.
After a series of public hearings about how to best accommodate growth in Denver over the next 20 years, residents in several neighborhoods are voicing their displeasure with City Council’s proposal to update its residential use rules in order to increase density in neighborhoods.
A Civic Dilemma
As the housing crunch continues to tighten, community leaders and other influencers are looking for ways to address the needs of vulnerable populations who face difficulty finding viable housing but does not cost the city any government money. These include persons at risk of becoming homeless, college students, people overcoming addiction and special needs individuals who must reside near service facilities — among others.
The Group Living Project (a City of Denver initiative) seeks to update the DZC’s definition of “household” and regulatory policies which would extend from single family homes to assisted living facilities, shelters and group homes. This initiative aims to amend the current Group Living Code to “increase flexibility and housing options for residents, to streamline permitting processes for providers while fostering good relationships with neighbors, and to make it easier for those experiencing homelessness, trying to get sober or who have other special needs [to] access services with dignity.”
Proponents argue that the plan would allow Denver to address its affordability problem by building non-traditional housing. Critics say that while the city does have an affordability problem, fixing it should not come at the expense of current homeowners.
This policy proposal is a key element of Blueprint Denver 2019, a 300-page document that outlines the city’s plans to accommodate growth through 2040. While it is not regulatory in nature, the hefty document serves as a supplement to a similar plan passed in 2002 and is meant to guide local government decision making into the future.
A Significant Change
The proposed amendment would increase the number of unrelated adults who can live together from two to eight in a property of up to 1,600 square feet in size. The provision would also allow another adult for every additional 200 square feet of finished floor area in larger properties. The breadth of proposed revisions to the DZC include more conservative recommendations of just four to six unrelated adults per property, yet all proponents of the amendment are championing the impending positive impact.
If the above parameters of eight adults in one home were amended into law, the new “household” definition would be applicable to 42% of single and two-unit properties. Similarly, nearly 58% of detached residences and duplexes could house up to nine unrelated adults and approximately 41% could house 11 or more adults unrelated by blood. While the new parameters would mildly affect “household” living in single-unit and multi-unit properties, they would greatly expand the potential for group living facilities — the number of which could rapidly increase — seemingly overnight. These could include properties that, after a quick remodel, could be repurposed into homeless
shelters, community corrections facilities (halfway houses), special care facilities, transitional housing, assisted living, nursing and hospice, co-ops, sober living, elderly care and student housing.
Questionable Motives
The Group Living Code Amendment is being proposed and supported by the Group Living Advisory Committee (GLAC). An insider of the group (wishing to remain unnamed) recently divulged that, curiously, over 75% of members and stakeholders in the GLAC have ties to for-profit group living businesses and organizations. Aside from household living, the above list of group living distinctions does one thing: it opens residential districts to dynamic, overlapping sectors of highly lucrative commerce. While increasing the number of people landlords can legally charge rent to, the amendments could potentially make Denver a prime target for corporate investors and foreign interests. The changes could cause yet another spike in residential property values, but then, as the rooming houses fill up, values could quickly decline due to lack of parking, noise, overcrowding, safety issues and sanitation concerns.
Tight Quarters: Would you pay $140 a week for this?
In recent years, measures similar to what the GLAC is proposing for Denver have been passed in Seattle, Atlanta, and Chicago. While Seattle’s housing crunch is well documented, perhaps it is not common knowledge that many homes in the city were bought by investors who divided up living rooms and garages to turn multi-bedroom homes into dormitory-like dwellings for up to 12 renters. In Atlanta, the loose definition of “household” is being exploited by outside and foreign investors who are turning neighborhoods into districts full of by-the-room renters with little stability and no protections. These units go for an average of $140 per week in properties with scant common areas and in many cases — one bathroom for the entire domicile. Meanwhile, a similar trend in Chicago dubbed “upzoning” has rendered an opposite effect city planners hoped it would have. In January of last year, Citylab .com reported: “A new study of zoning changes in Chicago finds that they led to higher, not lower, local home prices, while having no discernible impact on local housing supply.”
Follow The Money
Critics of GLAC assert that the GLAC’s plan was conceived via tunnel vision, because it contains various glaring instances of considerable oversight. The critics point out that the amendment includes no measures ensuring that new facilities are evenly spread throughout the city. It does not limit the opening of more facilities in communities that already have a concentration of such. It includes no stipulations for specific distances between facilities and it does not restrict for-profit homes in neighborhoods where no demand exists. For opponents, the bottom line remains that rental income on a single- family household unit could go from charging one family, to collecting week-to-week and month-to-month rent from eight to 12 residents. That’s a hefty incentive for landlords and investors in for-profit group living organizations.
Rules: Residential Use rules have pushed many low-income service providers to the outskirts of Denver.
“I just don’t see any positive things about it whatsoever,” said longtime Denver resident Jerry Doerksen. “There are already several houses in our area where four or more unrelated individuals are living together and the appearance of the home and yard reflects the lack of personal interest,” Doerksen said. “Four inhabitants, four cars. There is no enforcement of current code regulations, and it seems improbable that there would be any enforcement of regulations under the proposed plan.”
“Denver is a diverse city and the planners should take account of all the different characteristics of each neighborhood and the wishes of the residents,” one Washington Park resident who wished to remain anonymous told the Glendale Cherry Creek Chronicle in an emailed statement. “Further, Denver needs to assess all related impacts of such zoning changes.”
While Denver’s affordability issues live on, some homeowners see themselves as stuck in a no-win situation. They’re going to be forced to give up ownership of their property or their stake in a neighborhood, or both.
“Yes, there is a problem with the high cost of housing in Denver but it’s certainly not fair or appropriate to place the solution of the problem on the backs of homeowners who have chosen to live where they do in order to avert the very situations this proposal would create,” said Doerksen.
Whether the proposed amendment to the DZC will work is still a matter of speculation. At best, it could offer relief to the lack of affordable housing and at worst, it could convince reasonable people to not want to live In Denver at all. Either way, the GLAC is pushing to make group living property investors a lot of money.
Breaking Down Denver’s Rising Levels Of Air Pollution
by Luke Schmaltz
It’s rush hour on a Denver weekday
afternoon and bumper to bumper traffic is making the ride home a frustrating
punishment rather than a jettison to freedom. Then suddenly a jogger flies past
your window and a pang of guilt overcomes you that you are not getting your
cardiovascular exercise for the day.
But is that wannabe Forrest Gump really
engaging in a healthy activity? What the exercise-crazed spandex-clad hordes of
Denver may not be aware of is that hyperventilating amid throngs of automobiles
ain’t all it’s cracked up to be. The air circulating through your lungs is
saturated with elevated levels of ozone. On many a smoggy day, (there were over
100 in 2019) the air hanging over the city is what the Environmental Protection
Agency calls “in serious violation” of Air Quality Index (AQI) standards.
Essentially, by breathing rapidly and deeply next to a busy Denver street, you
may slowly be poisoning yourself.
A Man-made Hazard
Polluted Skyline: The Denver skyline takes on a New Jersey-esque complexion roughly one out of every three days.
A series of circumstances have coalesced to
form what could be considered a perfect storm of pollution across the city.
Increasing volumes of car exhaust due to population explosion, carbon emissions
from oil and gas mining operations, smoke from fireplaces and woodburning
stoves, emissions from power plants and industrial furnaces and sunlight
reacting with molecular oxygen particles has elevated the ozone levels past the
70 parts per billion (PPB) maximum recommended by the EPA. The aforementioned
100+ days in 2019 involved ozone levels past 80 PPB. The national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) were redefined in 2015 after extensive research into
the detrimental health effects of common air pollutants such as ground-level
ozone, particulate matter, lead, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and carbon
monoxide.
In Collaboration With Nature
Smokestacks: Smokestacks may not paint the sky black, but they deliver convincing shades of brown and gray.
What’s more, a global warming-driven
weather phenomenon known as temperature inversions are acting like an invisible
lid — trapping pollution in the troposphere rather than allowing it to
dissipate up through the stratosphere. Yes, the infamous brown cloud of the
1980s that Denver was internationally mocked for is back once again. This time
around, however, like fugly apartment buildings, a whitewashed retail landscape
and gentrification itself — this phenomenon is taking place in metropolitan
areas across the nation.
In a nutshell, ground-level ozone is
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) reacting with
sunlight and atmospheric air molecules. The Denver Regional Council of
Governments estimates that every day, between 250,000 and 350,000 cars are
being driven across the metro region. This transportation sector is the second
largest contributor of greenhouse gases next to industrial emissions. Plus,
there are over 23,000 active oil and natural gas wells across the front range
as well as numerous power plants across the Denver metro region.
A New Agency To The Rescue?
As of January 1, 2020, the Denver
Department of Public Works was renamed the Department of Transportation and
Infrastructure (DOTI) in a symbolic display meant to mark a new chapter of
planned environmental objectives. Among DOTI’s concerns is the Climate Action
Plan launched by the City of Denver in 2007 and rebooted in 2015. This “plan”
presents an “80×50” objective — meaning that through new measures and policies
the city aims for an 80% reduction of emissions (from the 2005 baseline) by
2050. A recent heavy-handed screed issued by Mayor Michael Hancock’s office
outlines a protocol of “aggressive and decisive action” for reducing emissions
through new renewable energy programs, energy efficiency and low operational
cost of electric vehicles. This letter celebrates Denver as having “a long
history of trailblazing when it comes to climate change.” If that is so, why do
pollution levels continue to rise? All of the industrial facilities, oil wells
and natural gas mines on operation require permits, correct? It would seem that
progress, when left to bureaucracy, is inevitably hindered by the inherent
sluggishness of government. Either that, or the tax revenue generated by these
facilities is simply too hard to pass up. Regardless, it would seem that the
climate action plan (CAP) is really just a bunch of crap.
It’s Up To You
Traffic: Many are involved but it’s nobody’s fault.
Like traffic jams — where many people are involved but are usually no singular person’s fault, pollution is the cumulative result of many people simply going about their daily business. As willing participants, the responsibility to reduce emissions should be taken up by the populace without being prompted by finger wagging and knuckle cracking from the hand of big brother. The EPA outlines a simple protocol of steps anyone can take at any time to reduce pollution. For example, you can walk, ride your bike, carpool or take the bus instead of driving a single occupant vehicle. Use slow-burning logs instead of wood in your fireplace, properly inflate your times for better fuel efficiency, use environmentally safe cleaning products and paint, reduce use of air conditioners and furnaces and mulch yard waste instead of simply throwing it away. But, and be realistic, you already knew all this, didn’t you? The issue is whether or not you care enough to endure a bit of inconvenience to do your small part, or if you’re going to carry on as usual — assuming that your neighbors and fellow citizens will pick up the slack while you lumber forth in a smog-laden haze. Theoretically, that’s fine enough, but the problem is — they are probably thinking the exact same thing about you.
