Will Colorado Actually Outlaw The Photo Radar Scam?
There is probably no more obvious municipal government rip-off than the photo radar and red light camera program run in Denver, Aurora, and seven other cities in Colorado. Its ostensible purpose is so-called “public safety” but everyone knows that its real purpose is a way for municipalities to pick the pockets of its citizenry.
State Senator Scott Renfro has for years been introducing legislation which would ban cities in Colorado from utilizing red light and speed cameras. The legislation is traditionally shot down in the first committee that it is sent to at the State Legislature. But this year something is afoot and the likelihood of the bill actually becoming law has dramatically increased.
Florida’s experience regarding red light and speed cameras is instructive. Florida’s red light cameras were not producing revenues at anticipated levels. Ways were sought to increase revenues and shortening yellow lights was viewed as an effective method. Unfortunately, there were, in fact, federal guidelines on the duration of yellow lights in order to best prevent accidents and Florida had adopted those guidelines. But as discovered by Channel 10 News in Tampa, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) quietly changed the state policy on yellow below the federal recommendations. This was followed by FDOT and local municipalities working together to decrease yellow light length at intersections with red light cameras. This collaboration had its intended effect of greatly increasing the amount of red light tickets issued in Florida, but in turn increased the amounts of accidents at these intersections.
The mere fact that these Florida bureaucrats were willing to increase the number of individuals maimed and killed at these intersections provided it increased revenues is highly instructive. As stated by James Walker, executive director of the nonprofit National Motorist Association, “Red light cameras are a for-profit business between cities, camera companies and the state.”
In Denver, the increase the profits at all costs attitude regarding red light cameras was also demonstrated when Denver’s red light cameras were not producing the anticipated profits. The solution was once again to move the goal posts. In this case in lieu of shortening duration of the yellow lights, which was getting bad reviews across the country due to the carnage it was creating, the Denver red light camera company had a different idea — deem a car to have run a red light even if it just touched the pedestrian white line — well before the intersection itself. Voila! The number of red light tickets grew exponentially.
Study after study has shown red light cameras tend to increase accidents even when the yellow lights are left at the federally recommended levels as drivers try to avoid a ticket by jamming on their brakes.
Regarding photo radar, many studies have shown the most effective way to slow traffic down is to place an interactive LED sign that alerts motorists at what specific speed they are traveling and what the legal speed limit is. Of course the interactive LED signs do not produce revenue and that is why Denver has many more photo radar vans than LED signs.
Red light and speed cameras are also a lucrative source of municipal corruption. A fired executive of Redflex Traffic Systems admitted that the company doled out bribes and gifts to dozens of municipalities in 14 states, including Colorado, to get them to utilize red light and speed cameras.
Could all of the evidence have finally gotten the attention of state legislatures? Well, something has. Renfro’s bill, S.B. 181 was sent to the State Senate’s Veterans and Military Affairs Committee which is known as the “kill committee,” as the members for the majority party take a blood oath to kill any bill the leadership of the majority party does not like. Miraculously the bill passed by a 3 to 2 bipartisan margin. That means that the Democratic leadership in the Senate supports the bill. The Democratic Speaker of the House Mark Ferrandino tweeted that he too supports the bill and will work for its passage in the House.
Further evidence of the favored status of the bill is the fact when it reached the floor of the Senate it passed by a “voice vote” which means opponents of the bill had no way of knowing who was for the bill and who was not before coming to final vote. The bill got final Senate approval by a wide 21-14 bipartisan margin.
Will S.B. 181 become law? It certainly looks like it will with House approval highly likely given the Speaker’s strong public support for the legislation. Governor Hickenlooper has been doing his standard Hamlet routine concerning the legislation saying he is studying the matter. This assertion by the governor is of course total malarkey. The President of the Senate (Morgan Carroll), Speaker of the House (Mark Ferrandino) and the Governor are all Democrats and jointly work out in advance what legislation will be allowed to become law and what will not. This is all Kabuki theater. If Hickenlooper opposed the legislation he would have had Carroll stop it in the “kill committee.” There is no political upside to vetoing a highly popular bill, especially when this is the year you are seeking re-election and may have a tough fight ahead.
It is too early to celebrate but a major victory for the citizenry may be just over the horizon. The city councils of Denver, Aurora and seven other cities may have to figure out another way to fleece their citizens from their money to make up the shortfall, but they will undoubtedly be up to the task. In the meantime, chalk one up for average everyday citizens in Colorado.
— Editorial Board
