A Post Partisan Political Moment

A Post Partisan Political Moment

ASHE IN AMERICA

— OPINION

There is a shift happening in Colorado that no one is talking about.

There are 4,022,433 registered voters in Colorado, according to the Independent Voter Project. Unaffiliated voters — those claiming no party affiliation — more than double the totals from either party. Democrats comprise 991,920 voters, or 24.7%; Republicans comprise 894,209 voters, or 22.2%; and Independents comprise 2,038,329, or 50.7%. Another 97,976 voters, or 2.4%, are listed as “other”, ostensibly a consolidated bucket of the other available affiliations.

The parties, and their media partners, will tell you that the “unaffiliated” voters are mostly still partisans whose lack of affiliation is a form of protest. The implication is, “Don’t take them too seriously, they still vote with the parties.”

The latter part of that implication is largely true, but only in that the two major parties, despite representing less than half of us, still enjoy a premium on ballot access, and its amplification by all the “trusted institutions.”

The former part of the implication, I argue, is false.

Colorado is not two parties. It is many factions, organized largely around causes. What unites these diverse factions is a distinct rejection of the two-party system, in part because that rejection is required to drive change in Colorado. That is, 2,136,356 voters in the state reject the two-party system but ostensibly lack the organizing apparatus to scale something new.

The parties brand this as partisans in protest, a framing that allows them to dismiss it and remain focused on the 1,886,129 voters attached to the two parties.

That brings me to the shift and the current political moment.

I attended the Colorado Citizenry event on July 8th hosted by Jonathan and Deborah Flora in Castle Rock. At one point, I found myself at a table discussing the Governor’s race. Two people at the table were committed to Lopez, two declared for Weiser, and one was considering under voting the contest — leaving the race blank on his ballot. Of those five, two were Republicans, two were unaffiliated, and one was a Democrat.

The discussion was robust, fact-based, and unemotional. There were no personal attacks and, importantly, there was zero discussion about parties for the simple reason that party discussions are irrelevant. That didn’t need to be said. It’s understood. The event was a blast. If there is a Colorado Citizenry event in your area, you should go.

I recently connected with Erin Brantley who is building “Independent Majority” to (my characterization, not hers) combat the party premium on the viability of non-party sanctioned ideas and initiatives. Like the Floras, Brantley is connecting and collaborating with individuals and groups of all political persuasions to imagine and organize something post partisan. Something new.

During the 2026 primary season, a group of local bloggers and podcasters began collaborating and sharing information and ideas in back channels. Like the other examples, those involved run the spectrum of political identity and content and audiences. During the primary, the group comprised support for all three candidates in the race. Local content is better for it, more grounded and balanced in the exploration of issues and ideas facing the electoral franchise before the November election.

There is nothing partisan about any of these anecdotes. The people involved represent many factions, platforms, goals, and movements. These efforts are unemotional and post partisan and they’re growing — despite the parties’ contention that 2,136,356 of us are just partisans in protest.

Now consider that inside the 46.9% that are affiliated with the two major parties, there are many factions. The problem with those guys is that they chase their tails fighting to control the party instead of the government. It’s our 250th birthday month, so let’s get George Washington’s take:

“The alternate domination of one faction over another…is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism… the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it. It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one party against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions.”

Spot on, President Washington. This is literally why we’re post partisan. Something new can be something old. Something new can be whatever we want it to be as long as we’re willing to build it.

People just need to be brave. 53.1% of us are more rightly oriented for change than the minority.

I think that change is happening now. The share of post partisan voters will increase.

“What truly matters is not which party controls our government,” President Trump said in his 2017 inauguration speech, continuing, “but whether our government is controlled by the People.”

Whatever you think about the President, that speech was a strategy statement, and the People are responsible for its execution. The two major political parties are a barrier to self-governance and gatekeepers of political support and advocacy. The moment for change is now.

Bright side: While the rest of the nation writes off the Centennial State as a communist lost cause, the People of Colorado are the tip of the spear for what comes after the people abandon the parties to the point they don’t matter.

The Golden Age of America isn’t something we’re going to inhabit and occupy. It’s something we’re going to build.

A Republic for the next 250 years.

Happy Birthday, America!

Ashe Epp is a local writer, host, and activist. Find all her work at linktree.com/asheinamerica.

Glendale’s Storm Gloor Elected To Colorado Municipal League ­Executive Board

Glendale’s Storm Gloor Elected To Colorado Municipal League ­Executive Board

by Mark Smiley

Storm Gloor

Glendale Mayor Pro Tem Storm Gloor has been elected to the Colorado Municipal League (CML) Executive Board, giving the city a stronger voice in statewide discussions on municipal policy and local government issues.

Gloor was elected during the Colorado Municipal League’s Annual Business Meeting on June 24, held as part of the organization’s 104th Annual Conference in Westminster. He joins a 21-member board responsible for overseeing the nonprofit organization’s finances, management, and policy direction while representing the interests of Colorado’s 270 member cities and towns.

His election places Glendale alongside leaders from communities across Colorado who help guide the League’s legislative priorities and advocacy efforts at the state Capitol.

The Colorado Municipal League plays a significant role in shaping legislation that affects local governments. According to the organization’s newly released 2025-2026 Annual Report, CML tracked 218 bills during the 2026 legislative session. The League successfully helped defeat 17 bills it opposed, secured amendments to 18 others, and saw 17 of the 30 bills it supported become law.

Gloor was one of five new members elected to the Executive Board. Others include Boulder Council Member Matthew Benjamin, Northglenn Mayor Pro Tem Shannon Lukeman-Hiromasa, Durango City Manager José Madrigal, and Centennial Mayor Pro Tem Amy Tharp.

Also elected to leadership positions for the 2026-2027 term were Golden Mayor Laura Weinberg as president, Breckenridge Council Member Carol Saade as vice president, and Parker Mayor Joshua Rivero as secretary-treasurer. Lone Tree City Manager Seth Hoffman will serve as immediate past president.

The Colorado Municipal League is a nonpartisan organization dedicated to serving and representing Colorado’s municipalities through advocacy, education, training, and legislative leadership. Gloor’s election gives Glendale direct representation on the organization’s governing board as it continues to address issues affecting cities and towns across the state.

Victor Marx Versus The Mainstream Media

Victor Marx Versus The Mainstream Media

Blasting With Boyles

OPINION

When I left KLAK and the morning show almost 40 years ago and headed to talk radio, looming in the city was The Denver Post, the Rocky Mountain News, powerful AM stations like KOA and KHOW. Channel 9 had Ed Sardella and Adele Arakawa, and before them Carl Akers. Opposing them were Bob Palmer and John Lindsey. Between the editorial blessings of the Post and Rocky Mountain News, and how KOA presented the news, and how the television stations of the ’80s presented the news, it was a very different time. They would have taken a candidate like Marx and beat him like a baby harp seal. He would have never survived even the primary.

It’s now been dubbed corporate talk ­radio. And we’re down to one newspaper, The Denver Post, that people only seem to read for the sports. In the timeframe we’re alluding to, receiving the editorial blessing for any candidate was a true gift. Almost as good as Patty Calhoun’s Westword talking about which person in Denver television had the best hair. (winky, wink).

Now Victor Marx treated Channel 9’s Kyle Clark like he was one half of a come­dy routine. Even as far as saying that his dog would bite Clark. Treating Kyle like the punchline in a joke. Talk radio, including myself, attempted to expose Victor Marx for the true fraud that he is. And guess what? The Republican candidate for governor is none other than Victor Marx.

And having survived in this business for many years in radio, and TV, and writing, what does that now say to me, as well as corporate talk and corporate ownership of TV news? It says we no longer matter.

The biggest losers in this primary are Barbara Kirkmeyer, Scott Bottoms, and the mainstream media. It’s the equivalent of the presidential runs of Pat Paulsen.

Now what will happen when Victor Marx meets Phil Weiser? I don’t know about you, but I think they can sell tickets a hundred bucks a shot for ringsides when Victor has to go up against Phil. The real significant question of that is, who do you want? Which one could more quickly destroy the state of Colorado that’s already in the destruction mode.

Believe it or not, I got Victor Marx on the points.

My friends say it doesn’t matter because the democrats cheat. See if Victor Marx can put a headlock on Phil Weiser and get a three count. Or for that matter, whether he debates at all.

And that doesn’t mean that it’s just Marx who won’t want to debate. I have a difficult time thinking Weiser will be on the other podium.

If there is a debate, you can bet Channel 9 and their team, and Kyle Clark would have the conn. And Victor Marx will make fun of them all.

Whatever, it’s certainly going to be more fun to watch than when the space cadet Joe Biden stepped out to debate Donald Trump when Trump had him at hello. Don’t you miss William Randolph Hurst, Edward R. Murrow, and Drew Pearson?

This is going to be fun to watch, and fright­ening, for an outcome. See you next month.

— Peter Boyles